Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › UpKeep · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

UpKeep

26Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

11 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

9 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. UpKeep was named 9 times in Fixed asset accounting, where Sage Fixed Assets led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business21 of 80

under the label threshold

Mid-market20 of 94

under the label threshold

Enterprise85 of 90

under the label threshold

In fixed asset accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named UpKeep for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Fixed asset accounting	Accounting and close	0%	20 of 94	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for UpKeep yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated UpKeep across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative21 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For maintenance-focused operations: UpKeep or Fiix are strong CMMS options” MiniMax M2.5 · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“The most mobile-first CMMS with a user-friendly interface” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Maintenance-focused asset management” Kimi K2 · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“UpKeep for mobile work‑order management” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as UpKeep, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and UpKeep was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Asset Panda21 of 262Not in the top three

Sage Fixed Assets20 of 265Not in the top three

IBM Maximo15 of 260Not in the top three

EZOfficeInventory13 of 264Not in the top three

NetSuite Fixed Assets Management13 of 261Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud Fixed Assets12 of 267Not in the top three

Infor EAM8 of 260Not in the top three

AssetTiger7 of 262Not in the top three

Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS7 of 260Not in the top three

Wasp AssetCloud6 of 260Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named UpKeep. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 26 answers that named UpKeep and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org22

financesonline.com15

capterra.com11

assetpanda.com10

bizbot.com9

softwareconnect.com9

wifitalents.com9

assetcues.com8

guideflow.com8

numeric.io8

109 of the 109 domain citations in answers naming UpKeep came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

worldmetrics.org/best/fixed-assets-management-software20

financesonline.com/fixed-asset-management15

worldmetrics.org/best/fixed-asset-management-software12

bizbot.com/blog/10-best-fixed-asset-management-software-20249

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-fixed-asset-management-software9

guideflow.com/blog/fixed-asset-management-software8

numeric.io/blog/fixed-asset-management-software8

assetcues.com/blog/fixed-asset-tracking-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as UpKeep

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as UpKeep; a claim can dispute any of them.

Upkeep 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when UpKeep's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as UpKeep, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at upkeep.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.