Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Accruent Lucernex · September 2026 Edition

Accruent · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Accruent Lucernex

15Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Accruent Lucernex was named 5 times in Lease accounting, where FinQuery led with 36%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business28 of 64

under the label threshold

Mid-market23 of 60

under the label threshold

Enterprise14 of 52

under the label threshold

In lease accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Accruent Lucernex for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	0%	23 of 60	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by FinQuery at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Accruent Lucernex yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Accruent Lucernex across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative15 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“fitting organizations where leases are inseparable from broader real estate operations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Lease accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“user reviews frequently note that the system runs slowly or becomes unresponsive at certain times of the day” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Lease accounting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Accruent Lucernex, over the 15 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Accruent Lucernex was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

FinQuery11 of 153Not in the top three

Nakisa Lease Administration10 of 154Not in the top three

Visual Lease10 of 150Not in the top three

LeaseAccelerator7 of 151Not in the top three

Trullion7 of 151Not in the top three

MRI ProLease6 of 150Not in the top three

Black Owl Systems5 of 150Not in the top three

CCH Tagetik3 of 150Not in the top three

CoStar Real Estate Manager3 of 150Not in the top three

BlackLine Lease Accounting2 of 150Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Accruent Lucernex. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 15 answers that named Accruent Lucernex and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com7

accruent.comYour site6

blackowlsystems.com6

guideflow.com6

nakisa.com6

trullion.com5

wolterskluwer.com5

acquisition-international.com4

capterra.com4

erpresearch.com4

Forty-seven of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming Accruent Lucernex came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-lease-accounting-software7

blackowlsystems.com/best-enterprise-lease-accounting-software6

guideflow.com/blog/lease-accounting-software6

accruent.com/solutions/lease-accounting-software5

trullion.com/blog/lease-accounting-software-solutions-for-asc-842-ifrs-16-2026-guide5

wolterskluwer.com/en/solutions/cch-tagetik/lease-accounting-ifrs16-asc8425

acquisition-international.com/best-lease-accounting-software-of-2026-from-compliance-to-ca4

gartner.com/reviews/market/lease-accounting-and-management-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Accruent Lucernex

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Accruent Lucernex; a claim can dispute any of them.

Accruent 2Lucernex 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Accruent Lucernex's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Accruent Lucernex, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at accruent.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.