Every category where a model named Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Fixed asset accounting	Accounting and close	0%	18 of 94	9%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	1	0	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative6 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative5 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Opt for highly rated options like Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS (strong for depreciation/tax)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Fixed asset accounting · negative prompt · first choice

“The gold standard for tax-heavy workflows — it's a vertical specialist built specifically for professional tax accountants” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“worth considering if your accounting team already works in the Thomson Reuters ecosystem” GPT-5.4 mini · Fixed asset accounting · direct prompt · alternative

“best for accounting-heavy firms needing deep depreciation and tax accuracy” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“The Concern: Reliability and transparency in calculations.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sage Fixed Assets19 of 234Not in the top three

Asset Panda14 of 230Not in the top three

IBM Maximo9 of 230Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud Fixed Assets8 of 234Not in the top three

NetSuite Fixed Assets Management8 of 230Not in the top three

UpKeep7 of 230Not in the top three

Bloomberg Tax Fixed Assets5 of 230Not in the top three

SAP Asset Accounting5 of 230Not in the top three

EZOfficeInventory4 of 230Not in the top three

MRI Fixed Asset Accounting4 of 230Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 23 answers that named Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com16

worldmetrics.org15

assetcues.com12

softwareconnect.com11

wifitalents.com9

financesonline.com8

softwareadvice.com8

capterra.com7

gitnux.org6

mrisoftware.com6

Ninety-eight of the ninety-eight domain citations in answers naming Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/fixed-asset-management-software16

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-fixed-asset-management-software10

worldmetrics.org/best/fixed-assets-management-software10

assetcues.com/blog/fixed-asset-tracking-software9

worldmetrics.org/best/fixed-asset-management-software9

financesonline.com/fixed-asset-management8

wifitalents.com/best/fixed-assets-accounting-software5

worldmetrics.org/best/fixed-asset-and-depreciation-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS; a claim can dispute any of them.

Fixed Assets CS 3Thomson Reuters / BNA Fixed Assets 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at thomsonreuters.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.