Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › G-CashFlow · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

G-CashFlow

10Judge labels

2First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. G-CashFlow was named 3 times in Cash flow forecasting, where Agicap led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business9 of 82

under the label threshold

Mid-market21 of 86

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In cash flow forecasting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named G-CashFlow for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	2%	21 of 86	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for G-CashFlow yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated G-CashFlow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“G-CashFlow leads for full three-way projections inside Google Sheets” Llama 4 Maverick · Cash flow forecasting · budget prompt · first choice

“Choose G-CashFlow if you want more structured three-way projections inside Google Sheets” Perplexity Sonar · Cash flow forecasting · budget prompt · alternative

“another affordable option starting around $59 per month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Cash flow forecasting · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as G-CashFlow, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and G-CashFlow was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Float9 of 104Not in the top three

Cash Flow Frog8 of 101Not in the top three

Pulse8 of 100Not in the top three

Fathom6 of 101Not in the top three

Dryrun4 of 100Not in the top three

QuickBooks Cash Flow Planner2 of 102Not in the top three

Brixx2 of 101Not in the top three

Fluidly2 of 100Not in the top three

Wave2 of 100Not in the top three

Zoho Books2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named G-CashFlow. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 10 answers that named G-CashFlow and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g-accon.com9

fathomhq.com6

guideflow.com6

quicken.com5

cubesoftware.com4

wise.com4

abacum.ai3

articsledge.com3

cashflowfrog.com3

savantlabs.io3

Forty-six of the forty-six domain citations in answers naming G-CashFlow came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g-accon.com/the-best-cash-flow-forecasting-software9

fathomhq.com/blog/the-best-cash-flow-forecasting-software6

guideflow.com/blog/cash-flow-forecasting-software6

quicken.com/blog/15-best-tools-for-small-business-cash-flow-and-tax-management-in-20265

wise.com/gb/blog/best-cashflow-management-software4

abacum.ai/blog/best-cash-flow-forecasting-software-for-smbs3

articsledge.com/post/cash-flow-forecasting-software3

cubesoftware.com/blog/best-cash-flow-management-software-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when G-CashFlow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as G-CashFlow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at gcashflow.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.