Every category where a model named Dryrun for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	0%	30 of 86	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	38 of 95	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Dryrun yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Dryrun across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative8 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want live operational cash visibility, look at Float or Dryrun.” GPT-5.4 mini · Cash flow forecasting · comparative prompt · first choice

“Dryrun (strong for scenario modeling)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Cash flow forecasting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Dryrun even lower (~$30/month)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“very reasonable pricing compared to other direct-sync competitors (like Dryrun, which starts at $200+/month)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Dryrun, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dryrun was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Float25 of 3011Not in the top three

Cash Flow Frog20 of 305Not in the top three

Fathom17 of 301Not in the top three

Pulse17 of 301Not in the top three

Anaplan9 of 300Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning9 of 300Not in the top three

Kyriba7 of 304Not in the top three

Cube7 of 301Not in the top three

Agicap7 of 300Not in the top three

Jirav6 of 301Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dryrun. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 30 answers that named Dryrun and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com13

tesorio.com13

cubesoftware.com12

fathomhq.com11

worldmetrics.org11

g-accon.com10

floatapp.com8

gitnux.org8

upflow.io8

articsledge.com7

101 of the 101 domain citations in answers naming Dryrun came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

tesorio.com/blog/best-cash-flow-forecasting-software-in-2026-reviewed-and-compared13

cubesoftware.com/blog/best-cash-forecasting-software11

guideflow.com/blog/cash-flow-forecasting-software11

g-accon.com/the-best-cash-flow-forecasting-software10

fathomhq.com/blog/the-best-cash-flow-forecasting-software9

upflow.io/software/best-cash-flow-forecasting8

articsledge.com/post/cash-flow-forecasting-software7

drivetrain.ai/solutions/cash-flow-forecasting-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dryrun's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dryrun, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dryrun.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.