Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Graphite Connect · September 2026 Edition

Graphite · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Graphite Connect

10Judge labels

2First choices

2Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Graphite Connect was named 7 times in Supplier management, where Procurify led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business84 of 114

under the label threshold

Mid-market6 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprise23 of 87

under the label threshold

In supplier management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Graphite Connect for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Supplier management	Spend and procurement	4%	6 of 80	14%	7	under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Graphite Connect yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Graphite Connect across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	1	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase4 labels2

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“or Graphite Connect if it's primarily a supplier-data/compliance workflow problem” GPT-5.4 mini · Supplier management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best Overall for Fast, Fraud-Resistant Onboarding & Data Verification” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Supplier management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“if security, verification, and compliance are the main requirements for onboarding vendors” Perplexity Sonar · Supplier management · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for Rapid Onboarding & Secure Supplier Data: Graphite Connect” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Supplier management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Niche or lightly reviewed products such as Graphite Connect ... because lower review counts can mean less evidence of how they hold up at scale.” GPT-5.4 mini · Supplier management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Graphite Connect, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Graphite Connect was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Coupa9 of 101Not in the top three

SAP Ariba7 of 100Not in the top three

HICX5 of 101Not in the top three

Kodiak Hub5 of 100Not in the top three

Zip4 of 101Not in the top three

Ivalua4 of 100Not in the top three

Jaggaer4 of 100Not in the top three

GEP SMART3 of 100Not in the top three

Gatekeeper3 of 100Not in the top three

Procurify3 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Graphite Connect. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 10 answers that named Graphite Connect and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com4

capterra.com2

g2.com2

highradius.com2

learn.g2.com2

reddit.com2

accountingweb.co.uk1

atlassystems.com1

auravms.com1

capterra.com.au1

Eighteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming Graphite Connect came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/supplier-onboarding-software3

g2.com/products/sap-ariba/reviews2

accountingweb.co.uk/any-answers/ariba-system-forced-on-small-suppliers1

atlassystems.com/blog/best-supplier-onboarding-software1

auravms.com/blogs/sap-ariba-alternatives-small-business-20261

capterra.com.au/directory/10024/vendor-management/software1

capterra.com.sg/reviews/1019890/graphiteconnect1

capterra.com/p/115928/Coupa/reviews1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Graphite Connect

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Graphite Connect; a claim can dispute any of them.

Graphite 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Graphite Connect's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Graphite Connect, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at graphiteconnect.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.