Every category where a model named Kodiak Hub for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Supplier management	Spend and procurement	2%	8 of 80	0%	21	accepted challenger
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	0%	38 of 127	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kodiak Hub yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kodiak Hub across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	4	2	6
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	2	5
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	2
Kimi K2	0	2	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labels2

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall: Kodiak Hub ... Start with a demo of Kodiak Hub” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Supplier management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“the newer, more user-friendly platforms (like Kodiak Hub, Zapro, and others rated 4.6\u20134.7) may serve you better” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Supplier management · negative prompt · alternative

“optimized for complex, multi-variable bidding, direct material supplier auditing, and logistics sourcing” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Strategic sourcing · scale prompt · alternative

“look at agile, modern, and modular platforms (like *Kodiak Hub*, *Zip*, *Procurify*, or *Stampli*)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Supplier management · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kodiak Hub, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kodiak Hub was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP Ariba29 of 374Not in the top three

Coupa28 of 372Not in the top three

Precoro16 of 375Not in the top three

Ivalua16 of 370Not in the top three

Procurify15 of 378Not in the top three

Jaggaer14 of 370Not in the top three

GEP SMART12 of 371Not in the top three

Gatekeeper12 of 370Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud Procurement6 of 370Not in the top three

Zip5 of 372Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kodiak Hub. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 37 answers that named Kodiak Hub and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

kodiakhub.comYour site18

mindsprint.com17

softwareadvice.com13

worldmetrics.org13

learn.g2.com12

g2.com10

gartner.com10

softwareconnect.com9

supplychaindesk.com9

capterra.com8

101 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming Kodiak Hub came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/supplier-relationship-management-software12

mindsprint.com/resources/blogs/vendor-management-software12

learn.g2.com/best-supplier-relationship-management-software11

supplychaindesk.com/blog/best-supplier-management-software9

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-supplier-relationship-management-software8

toolradar.com/blog/vendor-management-software8

gartner.com/reviews/market/supplier-onboarding-software7

procurify.com/blog/best-vendor-management-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kodiak Hub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kodiak Hub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at kodiakhub.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.