3 categories · RankedIvalua
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic sourcing | Spend and procurement | 4% | 8 of 127 | 18% | 11 | accepted challenger |
| Supplier management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 22 of 80 | 26% | 19 | criticized challenger |
| Procure-to-pay | Spend and procurement | 0% | 17 of 85 | 21% | 14 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“It is considered the top choice for mid-market and enterprise organizations due to its comprehensive features and flexibility.” Mistral Small · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · first choice
“shortlist against Coupa, Jaggaer, GEP SMART, and Ivalua” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Strategic sourcing · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Ivalua or JAGGAER if you need advanced source-to-pay flexibility and sourcing complexity.” GPT-5.4 mini · Procure-to-pay · comparative prompt · alternative
“stronger full-suite procurement platforms that tend to fit more complex organizations” GPT-5.4 mini · Strategic sourcing · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“avoid heavy enterprise suites like SAP Ariba, Coupa, and Ivalua” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Procure-to-pay · negative prompt · hard negative
“The same caution applies to Coupa and Ivalua at the enterprise level \u2014 powerful but clunky, expensive, complex implementations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Procure-to-pay · negative prompt · soft negative
“Often dinged for "enterprise-scale complexity," deteriorating supplier onboarding, UX friction, and long implementation” Grok 4.1 Fast · Supplier management · negative prompt · soft negative
“full enterprise suites may be overkill unless you're already heavily invested in that ecosystem” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Strategic sourcing · scale prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 179 of the 208 answers that named Ivalua and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
499 of the 542 domain citations in answers naming Ivalua came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ivalua's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ivalua, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ivalua.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.