Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › HSBC · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

HSBC

22Judge labels
0First choices
7Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Business banking for enterprise buyers
Rank 33 of 78 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 25% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In business banking · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named HSBC for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Business bankingTreasury and cash0%33 of 7825%4under 10 labels · led by Mercury at 20%
Cross-border payments and FXTreasury and cash0%62 of 83100%1under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HSBC yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HSBC across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative8 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“commercial banking relationship (Chase, BofA, Wells Fargo, US Bank, HSBC)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Business banking · direct prompt · alternative
“Excellent for international B2B companies” MiniMax M2.5 · Business banking · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Worst overall service quality; SMEs report no relationship manager... avoid the "big four" (HSBC, Barclays, Lloyds, NatWest)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Business banking · negative prompt · hard negative
“may not yet want the rigid, high-fee structure of a traditional tier-one global bank (like HSBC or Citi)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cross-border payments · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HSBC, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HSBC was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Chase Business Banking15 of 229Not in the top three
Bank of America13 of 222Not in the top three
Citibank10 of 221Not in the top three
Wells Fargo9 of 220Not in the top three
Airwallex8 of 222Not in the top three
Mercury8 of 221Not in the top three
Barclays6 of 220Not in the top three
Deutsche Bank6 of 220Not in the top three
Relay6 of 220Not in the top three
Wise Business6 of 220Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HSBC. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 22 answers that named HSBC and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com11
nerdwallet.com10
backbase.com9
airwallex.com8
finder.com7
found.com7
handelsblatt.com7
amnistreasury.com6
rfp.wiki6
rho.co6

Seventy-seven of the seventy-seven domain citations in answers naming HSBC came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as HSBC

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HSBC; a claim can dispute any of them.
HSBC Business Banking 1HSBC/Barclays 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HSBC's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HSBC, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hsbc.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.