Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › JasperReports · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

JasperReports

6Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. JasperReports was named 3 times in Financial reporting, where Sage Intacct led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market117 of 133

under the label threshold

Enterprise84 of 90

under the label threshold

In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named JasperReports for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	117 of 133	67%	3	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for JasperReports yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated JasperReports across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose JasperReports/BIRT if you need open-source or embedded reporting.” GPT-5.4 mini · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Rigid Open-Source & Legacy Java Engines (Avoid for New Builds)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · negative prompt · hard negative

“Legacy / "pixel-perfect" report writers (older BIRT, JasperReports, FastReport, SSRS, etc.) — ... severely limited for self-service dashboards” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial reporting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as JasperReports, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and JasperReports was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Power BI6 of 62Not in the top three

SAP Crystal Reports5 of 60Not in the top three

IBM Cognos Analytics4 of 60Not in the top three

SQL Server Reporting Services4 of 60Not in the top three

BIRT3 of 60Not in the top three

Looker3 of 60Not in the top three

Microsoft Excel3 of 60Not in the top three

Tableau3 of 60Not in the top three

FastReports2 of 60Not in the top three

Google Sheets2 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named JasperReports. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 6 answers that named JasperReports and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org2

accountsiq.com1

ataccama.com1

atlassian.com1

aufaitux.com1

axioworks.com1

barc.com1

bdo.com1

blazesql.com1

boldreports.com1

Eleven of the eleven domain citations in answers naming JasperReports came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

accountsiq.com/blog/breaking-out-of-spreadsheets-why-your-finance-team-needs-more-than-exc1

ataccama.com/blog/5-common-problems-with-enterprise-reporting1

atlassian.com/data/business-intelligence/10-data-visualization-tools1

aufaitux.com/blog/power-bi-vs-other-bi-tools1

axioworks.com/2025/12/popular-bi-and-reporting-tools-strengths-weaknesses-and-using-them-w1

barc.com/avoiding-problems-bi-projects1

bdo.com/insights/digital/sql-server-reporting-services-ssrs-is-reaching-end-of-life-now-wh1

blazesql.com/blog/crystal-reports-alternative1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when JasperReports's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as JasperReports, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at jasper.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.