AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Lark · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Named, not ranked

Lark

4Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
2 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lark was named 2 times in Corporate performance ma and 1 other category, where Planful led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Lark for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Corporate performance managementPlanning and analysis0%61 of 990%1under 10 labels · led by Planful at 22%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Financial reporting and dashboardsPlanning and analysis0%70 of 1050%1under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 33%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, Lark held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 10 points.

Best category · Corporate performance ma · by segment

Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 45 of 101, unchanged
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 10 pointsRank 58 of 91, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Corporate performance ma0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 61 of 99, unchanged
Financial reporting0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 70 of 105, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 10 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Lark across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00202
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lark, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lark was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ClickUp3 of 41Not among the top eight
Monday.com3 of 40Not among the top eight
Anaplan2 of 40Not among the top eight
Microsoft Power BI2 of 40Not among the top eight
Workday Adaptive Planning2 of 40Not among the top eight
Wrike2 of 40Not among the top eight
Asana1 of 41Not among the top eight
Cube1 of 41Not among the top eight
LiveFlow1 of 41Not among the top eight
15Five1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lark. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Lark and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

larksuite.comYour site4
golimelight.com3
management.org3
softwaresuggest.com3
cubesoftware.com2
effy.ai2
forbes.com2
gitnux.org2
kanbanchi.com2
www3.technologyevaluation.com2

Twenty-one of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming Lark came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

larksuite.com ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Lark takes 0% of first choices and Planful takes 22%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “epm software”
3
Position for “epm platforms”
–
not in the top ten

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 61 of 99 in corporate performance ma
Segment leader
22%
Planful
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
4 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on larksuite.com
38,797
subdomains included
Content
11,202
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
109 · 17
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Template or tool8,236undated
Blog2,112undated
Case study40102023-11-30
Comparison314undated
Conference or event3602023-11-30
Webinar or virtual event2702023-11-30
Podcast or video27162026-08-18
Glossary or explainer2312026-08-12
Report or ebook1902023-11-30
News or press7undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page larksuite.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Lark

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lark; a claim can dispute any of them.
Lark Suite 1

Follow Lark

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Lark is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Productivity Superapp for Chat, Meetings, Docs & Projects
Price stated
Prices in USD, excluding tax larksuite.com/en_sg
Starting price
0 larksuite.com/en_sg
Free plan or trial
Try for free larksuite.com/en_sg
Certifications
ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IIGDPR
Customers named
Haidilao7-Eleven PhilippinesZUS CoffeePOPMARTCarroGoTo GroupXiaomi
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, hosting

What Lark's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: larksuite.com/en_sg, larksuite.com, larksuite.com/plans, trust.larksuite.com, larksuite.com/product/okr. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lark's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lark, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lark by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Lark is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lark, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at larksuite.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.