Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › ManageEngine · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

ManageEngine

5Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ManageEngine was named 4 times in Corporate performance ma and 1 other category, where Planful led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business57 of 88

under the label threshold

Mid-market29 of 95

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In corporate performance ma · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ManageEngine for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	29 of 95	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%
Internal controls and SOX	Tax and compliance	0%	32 of 71	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by AuditBoard at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ManageEngine yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ManageEngine across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Spend your budget on Complies.ai or ManageEngine to automate these high-risk areas.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Internal controls · budget prompt · alternative

“ManageEngine free trials - Good for testing robust enterprise features” MiniMax M2.5 · Internal controls · budget prompt · alternative

“ManageEngine (Best Bundle)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate performance ma · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ManageEngine, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ManageEngine was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Admin By Request3 of 50Not in the top three

Mitti2 of 52Not in the top three

Cube2 of 51Not in the top three

Vena1 of 51Not in the top three

Anaplan1 of 50Not in the top three

Complies.ai1 of 50Not in the top three

CyberArk1 of 50Not in the top three

CyberFOX AutoElevate1 of 50Not in the top three

Datarails1 of 50Not in the top three

Delinea1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ManageEngine. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named ManageEngine and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cyberpress.org3

cybersecuritynews.com3

gbhackers.com3

golimelight.com3

drivetrain.ai2

effy.ai2

exabeam.com2

heimdalsecurity.com2

itprc.com2

mitti.com2

Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming ManageEngine came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cyberpress.org/epm-tools-by-business-size-33

cybersecuritynews.com/best-endpoint-privilege-management-tools/amp3

gbhackers.com/best-epm-tools-compared-23

golimelight.com/blog/best-epm-software3

effy.ai/blog/performance-management-software-for-small-business2

exabeam.com/explainers/sox-compliance/sox-compliance-software-10-tools-to-know2

heimdalsecurity.com/blog/privileged-access-management-pam-software-solutions2

itprc.com/sox-compliance-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ManageEngine

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ManageEngine; a claim can dispute any of them.

ManageEngine Solutions 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ManageEngine's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ManageEngine, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at manageengine.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.