Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Mastercard® Gold Card · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Mastercard® Gold Card

2Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Mastercard® Gold Card was named 2 times in Corporate cards, where Ramp led with 69%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market62 of 63

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In corporate cards · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mastercard® Gold Card for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate cards	Spend and procurement	0%	62 of 63	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 69%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mastercard® Gold Card yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mastercard® Gold Card across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“criticized for exorbitant annual fees ... while offering meager returns” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate cards · negative prompt · hard negative

“Listed among worst cards for rewards (7th year on the worst list)” Kimi K2 · Corporate cards · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mastercard® Gold Card, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mastercard® Gold Card was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

First PREMIER Bank Mastercard2 of 20Not in the top three

Amalgated Bank Maximum Rewards World Mastercard1 of 20Not in the top three

American Express1 of 20Not in the top three

Ariba1 of 20Not in the top three

Bank of America1 of 20Not in the top three

Brex1 of 20Not in the top three

CCT1 of 20Not in the top three

Capital One1 of 20Not in the top three

Chase1 of 20Not in the top three

Citi1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mastercard® Gold Card. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named Mastercard® Gold Card and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

reddit.com2

wallethub.com2

americanexpress.com1

bbb.org1

bill.com1

brex.com1

ca.trustpilot.com1

cardrates.com1

cgaa.org1

consumeraffairs.com1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Mastercard® Gold Card came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

wallethub.com/worst-credit-cards2

americanexpress.com/content/dam/amex/en-ph/network/documents/corporate/Amex_Corp_TCs_Mar_21

bbb.org/us/ga/atlanta/profile/credit-cards-and-plans/corpay-0443-7005062/customer-reviews1

bbb.org/us/ny/new-york/profile/credit-cards-and-plans/american-express-company-0121-605/cu1

bbb.org/us/ny/purchase/profile/payment-processing-services/mastercard--0121-3631/complaint1

bill.com/blog/corporate-credit-card-management1

brex.com/spend-trends/corporate-credit-cards/business-credit-card-fraud-prevention1

ca.trustpilot.com/review/ramp.com1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Mastercard® Gold Card

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mastercard® Gold Card; a claim can dispute any of them.

Mastercard® Gold Card (Niche Versions) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mastercard® Gold Card's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mastercard® Gold Card, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mastercard.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.