Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Chase · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Chase

23Judge labels
0First choices
8Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Corporate cards for mid-market buyers
Rank 24 of 63 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 33% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In corporate cards · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Chase for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Corporate cardsSpend and procurement0%24 of 6333%9under 10 labels · led by Ramp at 69%
Cross-border payments and FXTreasury and cash0%60 of 83100%1under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Chase yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Chase across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01034
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01113
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative7 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“look for cards from established networks (Amex, Chase, Capital One, Citi)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate cards · negative prompt · alternative
“look at traditional commercial cards (Amex, Chase, J.P. Morgan)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate cards · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“While traditional banks (like Chase, Bank of America, or Wells Fargo) are highly secure, they are generally the worst option for routine or large-volume international transfers.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cross-border payments · negative prompt · soft negative
“traditional banks (like Chase or Bank of America) are often difficult for small budgets because they require high personal credit scores and strict revenue thresholds” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate cards · budget prompt · soft negative
“Most standard small-business cards from traditional banks (like Chase, Capital One, or American Express) require the business owner to personally guarantee the debt.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate cards · negative prompt · soft negative
“traditional business credit cards from major banks (like Chase or Amex) often fall short because they lack the deep, granular spend controls” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate cards · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Chase, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chase was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Ramp18 of 2310Not in the top three
American Express18 of 231Not in the top three
Brex17 of 231Not in the top three
BILL Spend & Expense11 of 230Not in the top three
Airwallex6 of 231Not in the top three
Capital One5 of 230Not in the top three
Citi5 of 230Not in the top three
Rippling Spend5 of 230Not in the top three
Wells Fargo3 of 230Not in the top three
Airbase2 of 230Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chase. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 23 answers that named Chase and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com5
rippling.com5
nerdwallet.com4
ramp.com4
cnbc.com3
airwallex.com2
bill.com2
brex.com2
business-credit-us.blogspot.com2
corpay.com2

Thirty-one of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Chase came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chase's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chase, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at chaserhq.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.