AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › Mindglobal · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Mindglobal

25Judge labels
5First choices
2Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Telecom expense mgmt for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 89 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Mindglobal →
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In telecom expense mgmt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mindglobal for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Telecom expense managementSpend and procurement10%4 of 890%13accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mindglobal yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mindglobal across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash11002
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash20103
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K210102
GLM 4.7 FlashX10102
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase9 labels3
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“vCom Solutions / Tellennium / Mindglobal: Highly regarded for providing a strong managed service layer specifically tailored to mid-market organizations” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Telecom expense mgmt · scale prompt · first choice
“MindGlobal and vCom are the strongest all-around choices” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Telecom expense mgmt · direct prompt · first choice
“I recommend MindGlobal as the top choice” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Telecom expense mgmt · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Mindglobal” Kimi K2 · Telecom expense mgmt · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mindglobal, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mindglobal was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Tangoe One Telecom20 of 258Not among the top eight
Cass Information Systems5 of 250Not among the top eight
Cimpl4 of 250Not among the top eight
Upland Cimpl4 of 250Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mindglobal. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named Mindglobal and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

mindglobal.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Mindglobal takes 10% of first choices and Genuity takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “telecom expense management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “telecom expense management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
210 a month (“mindglobal”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 167 a month
Searches its site ranks for
83 · 7 in the top three
Sites linking to it
586
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
10%
rank 4 of 89 in telecom expense mgmt
Segment leader
19%
Genuity
First choices
5 across its categories
Named in
25 answers
Its own site cited
in 25 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on mindglobal.com
258
subdomains included
Content
207
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
2 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog11522026-07-30Expense management, Telecom expense mgmt
Case study3322026-08-28Expense management, Telecom expense mgmt
Report or ebook1802026-06-05Expense management, Telecom expense mgmt
Comparison1502026-07-02
Webinar or virtual event1402021-04-27
Template or tool502026-07-02Expense management, Telecom expense mgmt
Glossary or explainer4undatedExpense management, Telecom expense mgmt
Conference or event202026-05-27
News or press1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page mindglobal.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name expense management (51); 47 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Mindglobal

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mindglobal; a claim can dispute any of them.
MindGlobal 3

Follow Mindglobal

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Mindglobal is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Enterprise-Grade TEM and Mobility Management (TEMS), mobility management, fixed telecom, and UCaaS solutions.
For
large enterprises
Hosting
United StatesGlobal
Customers named
Coca-Cola Bottlers
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications

What Mindglobal's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: mindglobal.com, mindglobal.com/platform, mindglobal.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mindglobal's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mindglobal, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Mindglobal by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Mindglobal is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Mindglobal, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mindglobal.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.