Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › NetAsset · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

NetAsset

13Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. NetAsset was named 6 times in Fixed asset accounting, where Sage Fixed Assets led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business24 of 80

under the label threshold

Mid-market22 of 94

under the label threshold

Enterprise12 of 90

under the label threshold

In fixed asset accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named NetAsset for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Fixed asset accounting	Accounting and close	0%	22 of 94	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for NetAsset yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated NetAsset across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labels1

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“if your entire organization operates within NetSuite, NetAsset by Netgain will provide the cleanest, single-source-of-truth experience.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · direct prompt · alternative

“Covers every aspect of fixed asset management with features for asset tracking, tax scheduling, depreciation management, compliance” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Scaling enterprises, NetSuite users, and finance teams looking to shrink month-end close times.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best if you are currently using NetSuite or want an AI-assisted cloud close.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as NetAsset, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NetAsset was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sage Fixed Assets11 of 134Not in the top three

AssetAccountant8 of 132Not in the top three

Bloomberg Tax Fixed Assets8 of 132Not in the top three

Asset Panda8 of 131Not in the top three

IBM Maximo3 of 130Not in the top three

Fixed Asset Pro2 of 131Not in the top three

MaintainX2 of 130Not in the top three

QuickBooks2 of 130Not in the top three

Sage Intacct2 of 130Not in the top three

Xero2 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named NetAsset. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 13 answers that named NetAsset and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

netgain.tech4

softwareadvice.com4

asset.accountant3

bassets.net3

worldmetrics.org3

capterra.com2

lowrysolutions.com2

thecfoclub.com2

acquisition-international.com1

assetcues.com1

Twenty-five of the twenty-five domain citations in answers naming NetAsset came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

netgain.tech/blog/fixed-asset-depreciation-software3

netgain.tech/blog/fixed-asset-management-software3

softwareadvice.com/accounting/fixed-asset-accounting-software-comparison3

asset.accountant/blog/best-fixed-asset-accounting-software2

bassets.net/blog/top-7-fixed-asset-accounting-software-compared2

lowrysolutions.com/blog/best-fixed-asset-management-software2

thecfoclub.com/tools/best-fixed-asset-software-for-small-businesses2

acquisition-international.com/the-7-best-fixed-asset-depreciation-software-driving-finance1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as NetAsset

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as NetAsset; a claim can dispute any of them.

NetAsset (by Netgain) 2NetAsset by Netgain 2NetAsset Tax Pro 1Netgain (NetAsset / NetAsset Tax Pro) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NetAsset's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NetAsset, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at netasset.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.