Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › SAP Asset Accounting · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

SAP Asset Accounting

25Judge labels
3First choices
6Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Fixed asset accounting for enterprise buyers
Rank 86 of 94 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 50% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In fixed asset accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SAP Asset Accounting for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Fixed asset accountingAccounting and close0%86 of 9450%2under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP Asset Accounting yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP Asset Accounting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels2
Paraphrase4 labels1
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Consideration: More enterprise-focused” MiniMax M2.5 · Fixed asset accounting · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP Asset Accounting, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Asset Accounting was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Sage Fixed Assets19 of 257Not in the top three
Oracle Fusion Cloud Fixed Assets18 of 258Not in the top three
NetSuite Fixed Assets Management14 of 250Not in the top three
Asset Panda10 of 250Not in the top three
IBM Maximo9 of 250Not in the top three
Bloomberg Tax Fixed Assets8 of 250Not in the top three
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance6 of 250Not in the top three
Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS5 of 250Not in the top three
UpKeep5 of 250Not in the top three
Infor EAM4 of 250Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Asset Accounting. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 25 answers that named SAP Asset Accounting and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org19
gitnux.org13
guideflow.com12
wifitalents.com12
softwareadvice.com11
softwareconnect.com11
assetcues.com10
bassets.net10
b2bnn.com8
houseblend.io8

114 of the 114 domain citations in answers naming SAP Asset Accounting came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Asset Accounting's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Asset Accounting, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack