Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › AssetTiger · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

AssetTiger

29Judge labels
10First choices
1Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Fixed asset accounting for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 94 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 10 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In fixed asset accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AssetTiger for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Fixed asset accountingAccounting and close9%4 of 940%10accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AssetTiger yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AssetTiger across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash12003
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.510001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels2
Comparative9 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labels8
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“AssetTiger stands out as the best fixed asset accounting software for a company with a limited budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Fixed asset accounting · budget prompt · first choice
“For the absolute best budget choice, I'd recommend starting with AssetTiger or AssetCenter.app” MiniMax M2.5 · Fixed asset accounting · budget prompt · first choice
“The best fixed asset accounting software for a company with a limited budget is AssetTiger.” Llama 4 Maverick · Fixed asset accounting · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value: AssetTiger ... Start free with AssetTiger” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Fixed asset accounting · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AssetTiger, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AssetTiger was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Sage Fixed Assets14 of 296Not in the top three
Xero14 of 293Not in the top three
Asset Panda14 of 290Not in the top three
EZOfficeInventory12 of 291Not in the top three
QuickBooks9 of 293Not in the top three
AssetAccountant7 of 293Not in the top three
NetSuite Fixed Assets Management7 of 290Not in the top three
Snipe-IT7 of 290Not in the top three
UpKeep7 of 290Not in the top three
Fixed Asset Pro6 of 290Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AssetTiger. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 29 answers that named AssetTiger and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org25
capterra.com24
softwareconnect.com18
softwareadvice.com17
zipdo.co15
fitsmallbusiness.com13
tech.co11
financesonline.com10
getapp.com10
netgain.tech10

153 of the 153 domain citations in answers naming AssetTiger came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as AssetTiger

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as AssetTiger; a claim can dispute any of them.
AssetTiger (by Wasp) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AssetTiger's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AssetTiger, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at assettiger.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack