Every category where a model named Pipedrive for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue recognition	Accounting and close	0%	26 of 77	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 15%
Board and investor reporting	Planning and analysis	0%	90 of 97	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by OnBoard at 25%
Financial close management	Accounting and close	0%	28 of 68	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 60%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Pipedrive yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Pipedrive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative7 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained9 labels2

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative5 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative30 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pipedrive is highlighted as a good SMB-friendly choice for tracking recognized and deferred revenue without a full ERP” Perplexity Sonar · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · alternative

“A user-friendly CRM that allows small businesses to track recognized and deferred revenue” Mistral Small · Revenue recognition · budget prompt · alternative

“Best for visual pipeline management” Perplexity Sonar · Financial close manageme · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“A CRM tool that can be used for investor reporting, although it's not specifically designed for this purpose.” Llama 4 Maverick · Board · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Pipedrive, over the 30 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Pipedrive was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

QuickBooks Online13 of 306Not in the top three

Xero9 of 304Not in the top three

Maxio9 of 301Not in the top three

Flowrev6 of 302Not in the top three

TrueRev5 of 302Not in the top three

HubSpot5 of 300Not in the top three

Ordway5 of 300Not in the top three

Close4 of 301Not in the top three

Salesforce4 of 301Not in the top three

Trullion4 of 301Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Pipedrive. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 30 answers that named Pipedrive and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pipedrive.comYour site26

getapp.com16

zenskar.com15

wise.com13

worldmetrics.org13

dualentry.com12

ledgerup.ai11

younium.com11

guideflow.com10

rightrev.com10

111 of the 137 domain citations in answers naming Pipedrive came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

pipedrive.com/en/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software24

zenskar.com/buyers-guide/revenue-recognition-software15

wise.com/us/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software13

dualentry.com/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software12

worldmetrics.org/best/revenue-recognition-software12

ledgerup.ai/resources/7-best-revenue-recognition-software-for-saas-202611

getapp.com/all-software/revenue-recognition10

guideflow.com/blog/revenue-recognition-software10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Pipedrive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Pipedrive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at pipedrive.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.