Every category where a model named Quaderno for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales tax automation	Tax and compliance	0%	12 of 38	0%	10	accepted challenger
Global e-invoicing compliance	Tax and compliance	0%	38 of 108	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Avalara at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Quaderno yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Quaderno across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels4

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative39 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Quaderno is a strong second choice, especially if you already use Shopify, WooCommerce, or Stripe.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Global e-invoicing compl · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best for High-Volume Digital Products / E-Commerce Top Recommendation: Quaderno” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Global e-invoicing compl · direct prompt · alternative

“Quaderno: Best Flat-Rate Option for Multichannel & International Sellers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Sales tax automation · budget prompt · alternative

“Choose Quaderno if you need invoicing plus global VAT/GST” Perplexity Sonar · Sales tax automation · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Quaderno, over the 39 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quaderno was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TaxJar29 of 398Not in the top three

TaxCloud26 of 3911Not in the top three

Avalara AvaTax23 of 395Not in the top three

Stripe Tax18 of 390Not in the top three

Anrok16 of 390Not in the top three

Vertex14 of 391Not in the top three

Sovos12 of 391Not in the top three

Numeral11 of 391Not in the top three

Zamp9 of 390Not in the top three

Kintsugi8 of 390Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quaderno. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 39 answers that named Quaderno and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

quaderno.ioYour site25

taxcloud.com23

zamp.com21

learn.g2.com19

techrepublic.com17

galvix.com16

taxjar.com15

worldmetrics.org13

guideflow.com12

avalara.com11

147 of the 172 domain citations in answers naming Quaderno came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

quaderno.io/blog/us-sales-tax/top-sales-tax-software22

learn.g2.com/best-sales-tax-compliance-software19

taxcloud.com/blog/sales-tax-compliance-software19

techrepublic.com/article/best-sales-tax-software17

galvix.com/article/best-sales-tax-software13

zamp.com/blog/sales-tax-compliance-software11

zamp.com/blog/best-sales-tax-software-and-how-to-choose9

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-sales-tax-software8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quaderno's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quaderno, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quaderno.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.