Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Quantrix Modeler · September 2026 Edition
Quantrix · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Quantrix Modeler

5Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
3 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Quantrix Modeler was named 1 time in Financial modeling, where Datarails led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In financial modeling · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Quantrix Modeler for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Financial modeling and scenario planningPlanning and analysis0%82 of 1140%1under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Quantrix Modeler yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Quantrix Modeler across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Quantrix Modeler, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Quantrix Modeler was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Anaplan3 of 51Not in the top three
Microsoft Excel2 of 52Not in the top three
Google Sheets2 of 51Not in the top three
Cube2 of 50Not in the top three
Datarails2 of 50Not in the top three
Jirav2 of 50Not in the top three
Macabacus2 of 50Not in the top three
Vena2 of 50Not in the top three
Drivetrain1 of 51Not in the top three
Budgyt1 of 50Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Quantrix Modeler. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 5 answers that named Quantrix Modeler and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cubesoftware.com3
drivetrain.ai2
g2.com2
gridlines.com2
learn.g2.com2
adapt.digital1
aifyze.com1
aismartventures.com1
alphaapexgroup.com1
arxiv.org1

Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Quantrix Modeler came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Quantrix Modeler

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Quantrix Modeler; a claim can dispute any of them.
Quantrix 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Quantrix Modeler's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Quantrix Modeler, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at quantrix.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack