Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › SaleHoo · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

SaleHoo

2Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SaleHoo was named 1 time in Strategic sourcing, where Precoro led with 17%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business45 of 150

under the label threshold

Mid-market63 of 127

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In strategic sourcing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SaleHoo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	0%	63 of 127	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Precoro at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SaleHoo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SaleHoo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Prefer vetted alternatives like Global Sources, SaleHoo, Spocket (US/EU focus)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Strategic sourcing · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SaleHoo, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SaleHoo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

1688.com2 of 20Not in the top three

AliExpress2 of 20Not in the top three

Alibaba2 of 20Not in the top three

DHgate2 of 20Not in the top three

Global Sources2 of 20Not in the top three

AsiaInspection1 of 20Not in the top three

Faire1 of 20Not in the top three

HireEZ1 of 20Not in the top three

JingSourcing1 of 20Not in the top three

Juicebox1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SaleHoo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named SaleHoo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

naboo.app2

reddit.com2

salehoo.comYour site2

sourceready.com2

24454788.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net1

alicouriers.com1

alidropship.com1

arksourcing.biz1

asymbl.com1

blog.supportfinity.com1

Twelve of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming SaleHoo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

naboo.app/en-us/blog/supplier-risk-assessment-tools2

salehoo.com/learn/alibaba-alternatives2

24454788.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/24454788/OM_Guide_6-Common-Procurement-Techn1

alicouriers.com/best-sourcing-websites-from-china1

alidropship.com/is-dhgate-legit1

arksourcing.biz/post/china-sourcing-pitfalls-2026-guide1

asymbl.com/blog/ai-sourcing-tools-for-recruiting1

blog.supportfinity.com/the-best-sourcing-tools-for-recruiters-in-2025-pros-cons-data-drive1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SaleHoo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SaleHoo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at salehoo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.