Every category where a model named HireEZ for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Strategic sourcing	Spend and procurement	0%	33 of 127	27%	11	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HireEZ yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HireEZ across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative14 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Enterprise/high-volume | HireEZ | Broadest sourcing + automation at scale” Kimi K2 · Strategic sourcing · comparative prompt · first choice

“hireEZ - Best for enterprise-scale, multi-platform aggregation.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Strategic sourcing · comparative prompt · alternative

“High-volume, broad reach → HireEZ” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Strategic sourcing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Multiple complaints that personal data is harvested without meaningful consent” Kimi K2 · Strategic sourcing · negative prompt · hard negative

“HireEZ ($8k+/year)—they can overpromise on data freshness or automation” Grok 4.1 Fast · Strategic sourcing · negative prompt · soft negative

“HireEZ — very expensive for what it delivers” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Strategic sourcing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HireEZ, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HireEZ was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

LinkedIn Recruiter15 of 192Not in the top three

Gem14 of 194Not in the top three

Juicebox14 of 191Not in the top three

SeekOut13 of 190Not in the top three

Loxo8 of 191Not in the top three

Manatal8 of 191Not in the top three

Fetcher8 of 190Not in the top three

Findem7 of 190Not in the top three

SAP Ariba5 of 191Not in the top three

ContactOut5 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HireEZ. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 19 answers that named HireEZ and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com14

firsthr.app10

juicebox.ai9

leonar.app8

metaview.ai7

pin.com7

sitepoint.com7

dishertalent.com6

sourcingtools.org6

hiretruffle.com5

Seventy-nine of the seventy-nine domain citations in answers naming HireEZ came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-candidate-sourcing-tools14

firsthr.app/compare/hiring/sourcing-tools10

leonar.app/blog/best-talent-sourcing-platforms8

juicebox.ai/blog/best-sourcing-tools-for-recruiters7

sitepoint.com/best-sourcing-tools-for-recruiters7

dishertalent.com/blog/sourcing-tools-review6

matchr.io/blog/top-40-best-sourcing-tools5

metaview.ai/resources/blog/sourcing-tools-for-recruiters5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as HireEZ

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HireEZ; a claim can dispute any of them.

hireEZ 4HireEz (formerly Hiretual) 1hireEZ (formerly Hiretual) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HireEZ's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HireEZ, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hireez.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.