Every category where a model named Secureframe for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal controls and SOX	Tax and compliance	0%	39 of 71	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by AuditBoard at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Secureframe yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Secureframe across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative7 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SMB compliance automation | Control monitoring, evidence collection, audit preparation in one platform” Kimi K2 · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative

“$7,500/year starting, 30+ in-house auditors, great for SaaS companies” Kimi K2 · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“worth evaluating, though they're more commonly associated with security compliance than deep SOX program management” GPT-5.4 mini · Internal controls · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Secureframe, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Secureframe was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Vanta14 of 185Not in the top three

Drata13 of 183Not in the top three

AuditBoard12 of 182Not in the top three

Hyperproof9 of 181Not in the top three

LogicGate Risk Cloud8 of 181Not in the top three

Workiva7 of 181Not in the top three

MetricStream7 of 180Not in the top three

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management7 of 180Not in the top three

Archer5 of 180Not in the top three

FloQast3 of 181Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Secureframe. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 18 answers that named Secureframe and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com9

worldmetrics.org9

gitnux.org8

optro.ai8

v-comply.com4

checkthat.ai3

g2.com3

sprinto.com3

supervizor.com3

wifitalents.com3

Fifty-three of the fifty-three domain citations in answers naming Secureframe came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-controls-software9

worldmetrics.org/best/internal-control-management-software9

gitnux.org/best/internal-control-management-software8

optro.ai/blog/best-internal-control-management-software8

gitnux.org/best/internal-control-software7

worldmetrics.org/best/internal-control-software6

v-comply.com/blog/internal-control-software4

checkthat.ai/ai-answers/9066b2b1-cc6e-4bd2-8cc3-8b8a24aa38233

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Secureframe's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Secureframe, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at secureframe.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.