Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Sprinto · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Sprinto

22Judge labels

2First choices

1Negative labels

12 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

9 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sprinto was named 9 times in Internal controls, where AuditBoard led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business8 of 113

under the label threshold

Mid-market21 of 71

under the label threshold

Enterprise50 of 65

under the label threshold

In internal controls · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sprinto for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal controls and SOX	Tax and compliance	0%	21 of 71	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by AuditBoard at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sprinto yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sprinto across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative13 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for: Startups and mid-sized companies automating compliance and internal controls.” Mistral Small · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative

“Cloud-native/SaaS startup needing automation? → Sprinto” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Internal controls · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sprinto, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sprinto was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workiva15 of 221Not in the top three

Vanta14 of 222Not in the top three

AuditBoard12 of 226Not in the top three

Archer12 of 220Not in the top three

Diligent One Platform11 of 221Not in the top three

LogicGate Risk Cloud10 of 220Not in the top three

MetricStream10 of 220Not in the top three

Drata8 of 222Not in the top three

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management8 of 220Not in the top three

Hyperproof5 of 221Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sprinto. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 22 answers that named Sprinto and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com15

optro.ai15

sprinto.comYour site14

worldmetrics.org14

gitnux.org13

wifitalents.com11

supervizor.com7

v-comply.com6

metricstream.com5

orbiqhq.com5

Ninety-one of the 105 domain citations in answers naming Sprinto came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

optro.ai/blog/best-internal-control-management-software14

gartner.com/reviews/market/internal-controls-software13

sprinto.com/blog/internal-control-software12

worldmetrics.org/best/internal-control-management-software11

gitnux.org/best/internal-control-management-software7

gitnux.org/best/internal-control-software7

supervizor.com/blog/grc/internal-control/software7

wifitalents.com/best/internal-control-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sprinto's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sprinto, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sprinto.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.