Every category where a model named Optro for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Internal controls and SOX	Tax and compliance	4%	8 of 71	0%	11	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Optro yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Optro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	0	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase4 labels3

Comparative4 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained8 labels1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If the Internal Audit / Dedicated SOX Lead owns the project: Go with Optro (AuditBoard). It is the most robust and standardized system for auditors.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal controls · direct prompt · first choice

“Best Overall for Financial Controls, SOX, and Internal Audit: Optro (formerly AuditBoard) ... Optro is the industry standard.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal controls · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best for: SOX 404 compliance, internal audit management, and mid-to-large enterprises.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Internal controls · comparative prompt · first choice

“Other notable options include Optro, which is well-suited for mid-market to enterprise GRC teams” Mistral Small · Internal controls · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Optro, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Optro was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workiva16 of 271Not in the top three

MetricStream12 of 272Not in the top three

ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management11 of 270Not in the top three

Vanta10 of 271Not in the top three

FloQast9 of 273Not in the top three

Drata8 of 271Not in the top three

Hyperproof6 of 272Not in the top three

LogicGate Risk Cloud6 of 271Not in the top three

Diligent One Platform6 of 270Not in the top three

HighRadius6 of 270Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Optro. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 27 answers that named Optro and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

optro.aiYour site14

netwrix.com13

highradius.com12

riskpublishing.com9

riskwatch.com9

worldmetrics.org8

checkthat.ai6

zipdo.co6

arvexi.com4

complianceofficer.ai4

Seventy-one of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming Optro came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

netwrix.com/en/resources/blog/sox-compliance-software13

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-sox-compliance-tools12

optro.ai/blog/best-sox-management-software12

riskpublishing.com/best-sox-compliance-software-compared9

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-tools-for-sarbanes-oxley-act-compliance5

mitti.com/apps/sox-compliance-software4

zipdo.co/best/sox-compliance-software4

zluri.com/blog/sox-compliance-software4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Optro

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Optro; a claim can dispute any of them.

Optro (formerly AuditBoard) 6

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Optro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Optro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at optro.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.