Every category where a model named Sigma Computing for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	2%	11 of 133	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%
SaaS metrics and analytics	Planning and analysis	0%	22 of 81	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 45%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sigma Computing yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sigma Computing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	2
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase10 labels2

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Sigma - for teams whose data lives in a cloud data warehouse” Llama 4 Maverick · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best for companies whose data lives in a cloud data warehouse. Strong for more technical teams.” MiniMax M2.5 · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Other strong contenders include Sigma (best for teams with data in cloud data warehouses)” Mistral Small · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“For teams whose data already lives in a cloud data warehouse, Sigma is a better fit” Perplexity Sonar · Financial reporting · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sigma Computing, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sigma Computing was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Power BI13 of 195Not in the top three

Looker10 of 190Not in the top three

Tableau10 of 190Not in the top three

Fathom5 of 192Not in the top three

Mixpanel5 of 190Not in the top three

ChartMogul4 of 192Not in the top three

Amplitude4 of 190Not in the top three

Metabase4 of 190Not in the top three

Baremetrics3 of 190Not in the top three

Plecto3 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sigma Computing. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 19 answers that named Sigma Computing and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getfairview.com11

sigmacomputing.comYour site11

worldmetrics.org10

zipdo.co7

greatstartuptools.com6

databox.com5

abacum.ai3

basedash.com3

gitnux.org3

b2b-saas-tool-hub.vercel.app2

Fifty of the sixty-one domain citations in answers naming Sigma Computing came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

sigmacomputing.com/blog/best-financial-dashboard-software10

worldmetrics.org/best/finance-dashboard-software10

getfairview.com/blog/best-financial-dashboard-software9

zipdo.co/best/finance-dashboard-software7

greatstartuptools.com/best-financial-dashboard-software6

worldmetrics.org/best/financial-dashboard-software6

gitnux.org/best/finance-dashboard-software3

abacum.ai/blog/kpi-dashboard-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Sigma Computing

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sigma Computing; a claim can dispute any of them.

Sigma 8

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sigma Computing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sigma Computing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sigmacomputing.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.