Every category where a model named Amplitude for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SaaS metrics and analytics	Planning and analysis	0%	13 of 81	29%	21	criticized challenger
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	48 of 133	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Amplitude yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Amplitude across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	3	0	1	4
GPT-5.4 mini	2	1	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1	2
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct15 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative27 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative14 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative64 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Amplitude is an enterprise product analytics platform with behavioral cohort analysis, predictive insights” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SaaS metrics · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for mid-market to enterprise SaaS with dedicated data teams and complex product analytics needs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SaaS metrics · direct prompt · alternative

“Choose Amplitude or Mixpanel if your main question is how users behave inside the product.” Perplexity Sonar · SaaS metrics · comparative prompt · alternative

“pair a SaaS metrics tool with a product analytics tool like Amplitude or Mixpanel” GPT-5.4 mini · SaaS metrics · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“They are terrible at calculating Net Revenue Retention (NRR), churn reasons, LTV:CAC ratios, or forecasting cash flow accurately.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · hard negative

“Be cautious if: Scaling events volume (pricing opaque, jumps to $5K+/mo; limited data retention ~2 years). Steep learning curve” Grok 4.1 Fast · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative

“Don't start with Amplitude unless you have a dedicated analyst and significant revenue.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative

“does not disclose the cost of its growth plan without contacting their sales team” Claude Haiku 4.5 · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Amplitude, over the 64 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Amplitude was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChartMogul51 of 6431Not in the top three

Mixpanel50 of 641Not in the top three

Baremetrics48 of 646Not in the top three

ProfitWell Metrics32 of 646Not in the top three

Databox30 of 643Not in the top three

PostHog29 of 641Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI24 of 641Not in the top three

Looker23 of 640Not in the top three

Tableau21 of 642Not in the top three

Heap13 of 640Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Amplitude. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 54 of the 64 answers that named Amplitude and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

designrevision.com36

databox.com29

baremetrics.com26

getfairview.com26

saasrise.com19

amplitude.comYour site16

userpilot.com16

cometly.com15

usedaymark.io14

openaiclaude.com13

194 of the 210 domain citations in answers naming Amplitude came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

designrevision.com/blog/saas-reporting-tools36

saasrise.com/blog/saas-metrics-platform-rankings-report19

baremetrics.com/blog/baremetrics-vs-chartmogul-vs-profitwell17

databox.com/10-analytics-tools-that-help-every-team-member-magically-boost-performance17

databox.com/best-analytics-tools-saas-companies16

getfairview.com/best/saas-metrics-software16

getfairview.com/blog/best-saas-analytics-tools15

usedaymark.io/blog/best-data-analysis-tools-for-saas14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Amplitude's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Amplitude, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at amplitude.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.