Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Silicon Valley Bank · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Silicon Valley Bank

14Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Silicon Valley Bank was named 4 times in Business banking, where Mercury led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business39 of 64

under the label threshold

Mid-market22 of 78

under the label threshold

Enterprise98 of 99

under the label threshold

In business banking · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Silicon Valley Bank for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Business banking	Treasury and cash	0%	22 of 78	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Mercury at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Silicon Valley Bank yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Silicon Valley Bank across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Great for tech and B2B companies with growth focus” MiniMax M2.5 · Business banking · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Silicon Valley Bank, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Silicon Valley Bank was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Chase Business Banking13 of 142Not in the top three

Mercury11 of 144Not in the top three

Bank of America8 of 140Not in the top three

Brex7 of 141Not in the top three

Wells Fargo7 of 140Not in the top three

Rho5 of 140Not in the top three

Citibank3 of 140Not in the top three

First Republic3 of 140Not in the top three

HSBC3 of 140Not in the top three

Novo3 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Silicon Valley Bank. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 14 answers that named Silicon Valley Bank and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

handelsblatt.com4

nerdwallet.com4

rho.co4

airwallex.com3

backbase.com3

clarityglobalinc.com3

ethicalconsumer.org3

relayfi.com3

waveup.com3

bluevine.com2

Thirty-two of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming Silicon Valley Bank came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

handelsblatt.com/geschaeftskonto/vergleich4

clarityglobalinc.com/blog/how-high-risk-businesses-can-open-and-maintain-reliable-business3

ethicalconsumer.org/money-finance/shopping-guide/ethical-business-banking3

rho.co/blog/best-startup-banks3

waveup.com/blog/best-banks-for-startups3

airwallex.com/en-us/blog/compare-business-bank-accounts2

backbase.com/blog/top-business-banking-platform-providers2

getbanked.co/blog/high-risk-business-banking-guide2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Silicon Valley Bank

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Silicon Valley Bank; a claim can dispute any of them.

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) 1Silicon Valley Bank’s successor 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Silicon Valley Bank's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Silicon Valley Bank, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at silicon.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.