Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Novo · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Novo

52Judge labels
8First choices
7Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in Business banking for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 78 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 19 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In business banking · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Novo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Business bankingTreasury and cash5%7 of 785%19accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Novo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Novo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502002
GPT-5.4 mini00101
Gemini 3.5 Flash11013
Perplexity Sonar02002
Grok 4.1 Fast20002
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash02103
Kimi K200202
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels2
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative17 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained14 labels5
Scale-constrained5 labels1
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Novo: Best for Simple, 100% Fee-Free Banking ... Choose Novo if you want an all-around free account with great integrations and ATM fee refunds.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business banking · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Bluevine or Novo—open online in minutes with EIN/SSN.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Business banking · budget prompt · first choice
“For US solos: Novo/Bluevine.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Business banking · comparative prompt · first choice
“Bluevine and Novo offer small business checking accounts with no monthly maintenance fees and no minimum balance requirements” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Business banking · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“neobanks (such as Mercury, Bluevine, or Novo) rely heavily on automated fraud-detection algorithms” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business banking · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Novo, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Novo was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Mercury44 of 529Not in the top three
Bluevine42 of 5210Not in the top three
Relay35 of 525Not in the top three
Chase Business Banking33 of 523Not in the top three
Bank of America20 of 521Not in the top three
Wells Fargo15 of 520Not in the top three
Found14 of 521Not in the top three
Axos Bank13 of 521Not in the top three
Brex11 of 523Not in the top three
U.S. Bank11 of 521Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Novo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 52 answers that named Novo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

nerdwallet.com28
finder.com27
handelsblatt.com25
found.com24
airwallex.com22
forbes.com18
bluevine.com16
smallbusinesstools.org16
rho.co13
wise.com13

202 of the 202 domain citations in answers naming Novo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Novo

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Novo; a claim can dispute any of them.
Novo Business Checking 3Novo / Found 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Novo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Novo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at novo.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.