Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › SurePayroll · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

SurePayroll

8Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SurePayroll was named 3 times in Contractor payments, where Deel led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In contractor payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SurePayroll for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Contractor paymentsSpend and procurement2%14 of 830%3under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SurePayroll yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SurePayroll across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best fit is usually SurePayroll if you want an affordable, contractor-focused payroll tool” Perplexity Sonar · Contractor payments · budget prompt · first choice
“followed closely by SurePayroll or Patriot Software depending on your specific needs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Contractor payments · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SurePayroll, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SurePayroll was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Gusto6 of 82Not in the top three
Square Payroll4 of 81Not in the top three
BILL2 of 80Not in the top three
Melio2 of 80Not in the top three
Patriot Software2 of 80Not in the top three
QuickBooks2 of 80Not in the top three
Deel1 of 81Not in the top three
QuickBooks Contractor Payments1 of 81Not in the top three
QuickBooks Contractor Payments / Payroll1 of 81Not in the top three
Tax10991 of 81Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SurePayroll. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named SurePayroll and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

wingspan.app8
gusto.com7
worksuite.com5
learn.g2.com4
remote.com4
wise.com4
analyticsinsight.net3
capterra.com3
firsthr.app3
guideflow.com3

Forty-four of the forty-four domain citations in answers naming SurePayroll came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SurePayroll's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SurePayroll, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at surepayroll.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack