Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › ThoughtSpot · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

ThoughtSpot

11Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ThoughtSpot was named 4 times in Financial reporting and 1 other category, where Sage Intacct led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business95 of 108

under the label threshold

Mid-market31 of 133

under the label threshold

Enterprise28 of 90

under the label threshold

In financial reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ThoughtSpot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	31 of 133	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%
SaaS metrics and analytics	Planning and analysis	0%	65 of 81	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 45%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ThoughtSpot yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ThoughtSpot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose ThoughtSpot if you want search-based analytics for non-technical users.” GPT-5.4 mini · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best For: Natural language, search-driven analytics (AI-first BI).” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Search-driven and AI-powered analytics” MiniMax M2.5 · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ThoughtSpot, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ThoughtSpot was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Tableau11 of 112Not in the top three

Microsoft Power BI10 of 117Not in the top three

Looker8 of 110Not in the top three

IBM Cognos Analytics5 of 110Not in the top three

Qlik Sense5 of 110Not in the top three

Domo4 of 110Not in the top three

Metabase4 of 110Not in the top three

SAP Analytics Cloud4 of 110Not in the top three

Apache Superset3 of 110Not in the top three

Looker Studio2 of 111Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ThoughtSpot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 11 answers that named ThoughtSpot and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org5

kanerika.com4

zipdo.co4

solutionsreview.com3

emailanalytics.com2

fanruan.com2

passionned.com2

peerspot.com2

querio.ai2

thoughtspot.comYour site2

Twenty-six of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming ThoughtSpot came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

kanerika.com/blogs/enterprise-reporting-tools4

worldmetrics.org/best/enterprise-reporting-software4

worldmetrics.org/best/enterprise-report-management-software3

zipdo.co/best/enterprise-reporting-software3

emailanalytics.com/27-enterprise-analytics-tools-that-we-highly-recommend2

peerspot.com/categories/reporting2

solutionsreview.com/business-intelligence/the-best-enterprise-reporting-solutions2

worldmetrics.org/best/business-intelligence-and-reporting-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ThoughtSpot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ThoughtSpot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at thoughtspot.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.