Every category where a model named Zoho Analytics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Financial reporting and dashboards	Planning and analysis	0%	25 of 133	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 27%
Corporate performance management	Planning and analysis	0%	74 of 95	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Planful at 29%
Financial modeling and scenario planning	Planning and analysis	0%	60 of 114	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Datarails at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Zoho Analytics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Zoho Analytics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative14 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Financial reporting: Power BI, Zoho Analytics (Excel integration, automation, affordability)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · first choice

“Choose Zoho Analytics if you're a small business looking for value and ease of use” Kimi K2 · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

“for true budget constraints, Zoho Analytics is worth looking at” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Financial modeling · budget prompt · alternative

“Zoho Analytics - Affordable for SMBs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Financial reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Zoho Analytics, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Zoho Analytics was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Power BI15 of 222Not in the top three

Looker Studio12 of 225Not in the top three

Tableau11 of 221Not in the top three

Databox10 of 224Not in the top three

Domo8 of 220Not in the top three

Klipfolio6 of 220Not in the top three

Metabase6 of 220Not in the top three

Monday.com6 of 220Not in the top three

Anaplan5 of 220Not in the top three

ClickUp5 of 220Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Zoho Analytics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 22 answers that named Zoho Analytics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org14

thedigitalprojectmanager.com11

zipdo.co10

databox.com8

fanruan.com8

zoho.com8

ustechautomations.com7

domo.com6

clickup.com5

improvado.io5

Eighty-two of the eighty-two domain citations in answers naming Zoho Analytics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-reporting-tools11

ustechautomations.com/resources/blog/best-reporting-analytics-software-small-business-20267

worldmetrics.org/best/reporting-software7

zipdo.co/best/small-business-reporting-software6

clickup.com/blog/reporting-tools5

databox.com/best-reporting-tools5

integrate.io/blog/the-7-best-reporting-tools5

monday.com/blog/project-management/reporting-tools-guide5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho Analytics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho Analytics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zohoanalytics.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.