Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Totango · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Totango

5Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Totango was named 1 time in SaaS metrics, where ChartMogul led with 45%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business67 of 80

under the label threshold

Mid-market39 of 81

under the label threshold

Enterprise47 of 127

under the label threshold

In saas metrics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Totango for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
SaaS metrics and analytics	Planning and analysis	0%	39 of 81	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChartMogul at 45%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Totango yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Totango across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I have a team of Account Managers. | Totango | Organizes workflows for human-led retention.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · SaaS metrics · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Totango, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Totango was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ChartMogul5 of 52Not in the top three

Baremetrics5 of 51Not in the top three

ProfitWell Metrics4 of 51Not in the top three

Gainsight3 of 50Not in the top three

Looker3 of 50Not in the top three

Maxio2 of 50Not in the top three

Mixpanel2 of 50Not in the top three

Databox1 of 51Not in the top three

Amplitude1 of 50Not in the top three

Anaplan1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Totango. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 5 answers that named Totango and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

designrevision.com3

getfairview.com3

baremetrics.com2

churntools.com2

artisangrowthstrategies.com1

basedash.com1

buttondown.com1

causal.app1

chartsy.app1

clickup.com1

Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Totango came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

designrevision.com/blog/saas-reporting-tools3

baremetrics.com/blog/baremetrics-vs-chartmogul-vs-profitwell2

churntools.com/blog/how-to-choose-saas-metrics-tool2

getfairview.com/blog/best-saas-analytics-tools2

artisangrowthstrategies.com/blog/profitwell-vs-chartmogul-vs-baremetrics-20261

baremetrics.com/blog/5-mistakes-to-avoid-when-tracking-saas-metrics1

baremetrics.com/blog/baremetrics-vs-chartmogul-vs-stripe-analytics1

baremetrics.com/blog/what-is-chartmogul1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Totango's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Totango, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at totango.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.