Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › ProfitWell Metrics · September 2026 Edition
ProfitWell · 1 category · Ranked

ProfitWell Metrics

104Judge labels
24First choices
18Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
29% in SaaS metrics for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 81 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 38 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In saas metrics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ProfitWell Metrics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
SaaS metrics and analyticsPlanning and analysis17%2 of 8118%38accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ProfitWell Metrics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ProfitWell Metrics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash11035
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast11103
Mistral Small12205
DeepSeek V4 Flash12014
Llama 4 Maverick03003
Qwen 3.7 Flash01012
Kimi K212115
GLM 4.7 FlashX04004
MiniMax M2.511114

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels6
Paraphrase13 labels4
Comparative24 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained23 labels14
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative23 labels5not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative104 labels in all, every segment counted; 24 of the 35 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose ProfitWell if you want the absolute best, most accurate, completely free revenue/billing metrics dashboard with zero setup time.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS metrics · budget prompt · first choice
“For most startups on a tight budget, ProfittWell + Looker Studio (both free) gives you 90% of what you need.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SaaS metrics · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with ProfitWell if you're under $50K MRR. It's completely free with no usage caps” Kimi K2 · SaaS metrics · budget prompt · first choice
“For pure revenue tracking with zero cost, ProfitWell is the top recommendation.” MiniMax M2.5 · SaaS metrics · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“If you're not on Paddle's payment platform, don't use ProfitWell metrics. You're building on a deprecated roadmap.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · hard negative
“It is not built to handle manual, sales-assisted enterprise contracts managed in a CRM. ... ProfitWell is not the right fit.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS metrics · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“you have likely outgrown early-stage, plug-and-play tools (like Baremetrics or ProfitWell)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SaaS metrics · direct prompt · soft negative
“ProfitWell | Limited to Stripe/Paddle, less flexible for complex billing” MiniMax M2.5 · SaaS metrics · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ProfitWell Metrics, over the 104 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ProfitWell Metrics was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Baremetrics78 of 1049Not in the top three
Databox47 of 1045Not in the top three
Mixpanel43 of 1040Not in the top three
Amplitude32 of 1041Not in the top three
Microsoft Power BI32 of 1041Not in the top three
PostHog31 of 1041Not in the top three
Tableau28 of 1040Not in the top three
Looker23 of 1040Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ProfitWell Metrics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 84 of the 104 answers that named ProfitWell Metrics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

designrevision.com68
baremetrics.com49
databox.com49
getfairview.com48
saasrise.com29
artisangrowthstrategies.com23
churntools.com21
taskade.com21
chartsy.app18
revpane.com18

344 of the 344 domain citations in answers naming ProfitWell Metrics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ProfitWell Metrics

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ProfitWell Metrics; a claim can dispute any of them.
ProfitWell 11ProfitWell (Paddle Metrics) 4ProfitWell (by Paddle) 4ProfitWell Metrics (by Paddle) 4ProfitWell (Paddle Retain) 3ProfitWell (now Paddle Metrics) 3ProfitWell (Paddle) 2ProfitWell (Paddle Retain Metrics) 1ProfitWell (now Paddle) 1ProfitWell Metrics (now part of Paddle) 1ProfitWell Metrics (now under Paddle) 1Profitwell 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ProfitWell Metrics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ProfitWell Metrics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at profitwell.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack