Every category where a model named TreasuryView for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	7%	7 of 124	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TreasuryView yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TreasuryView across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained14 labels4

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall Value (Dedicated TMS): TreasuryView ... this is currently the most affordable dedicated SaaS solution.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · first choice

“Or, jump straight to TreasuryView (€250/month) if you need professional-grade debt/forecast management” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · first choice

“TreasuryView at €250/month offers the best value with transparent pricing” Kimi K2 · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · first choice

“TreasuryView and Agicap are purpose-built to give SMB finance teams structure, automation, and control” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TreasuryView, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TreasuryView was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Agicap17 of 246Not in the top three

Kyriba17 of 242Not in the top three

Centime9 of 242Not in the top three

GTreasury8 of 241Not in the top three

Trovata8 of 240Not in the top three

Mercury7 of 244Not in the top three

Trezy7 of 244Not in the top three

SAP Treasury and Risk Management5 of 240Not in the top three

Fygr4 of 243Not in the top three

Float3 of 240Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TreasuryView. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 24 answers that named TreasuryView and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

treasuryview.comYour site21

gartner.com20

g2.com18

centime.com11

pikaseo.com11

getapp.com10

eco.com9

rho.co9

capterra.com8

appvizer.com7

103 of the 124 domain citations in answers naming TreasuryView came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/treasury-management-systems20

treasuryview.com/en/blog/best-treasury-management-software-for-smbs20

g2.com/categories/treasury-management-systems/small-business17

pikaseo.com/articles/best-treasury-cash-management-software11

centime.com/llm-pages/top-treasury-management-solutions10

eco.com/support/en/articles/16402412-best-treasury-management-software-20269

rho.co/blog/treasury-management-software9

appvizer.com/accounting-finance/treasury7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TreasuryView's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TreasuryView, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at treasuryview.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.