Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Trove · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Trove

5Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Trove was named 2 times in B2B credit management, where Tesorio led with 16%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business49 of 78

under the label threshold

Mid-market20 of 82

under the label threshold

Enterprise66 of 70

under the label threshold

In b2b credit management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Trove for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
B2B credit management	Receivables and billing	2%	20 of 82	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Tesorio at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trove yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trove across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you are a very small business using QuickBooks or Xero... go with Trove.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · B2B credit management · budget prompt · first choice

“### 3. Trove - Fixed Price Option” Kimi K2 · B2B credit management · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trove, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trove was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Chaser4 of 52Not in the top three

HighRadius Credit Cloud3 of 51Not in the top three

Paidnice3 of 51Not in the top three

Billtrust2 of 50Not in the top three

Sidetrade2 of 50Not in the top three

Upflow2 of 50Not in the top three

ezyCollect2 of 50Not in the top three

Bectran1 of 50Not in the top three

Credit Pulse1 of 50Not in the top three

Creditsafe1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trove. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 5 answers that named Trove and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

paidnice.com3

trove.worksYour site3

chaserhq.com2

creditpulse.com2

guideflow.com2

worldmetrics.org2

accessintell.com1

accounting.events1

accountsreceivable.ai1

api2.f6s.com1

Fifteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming Trove came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

creditpulse.com/credit-management-software2

guideflow.com/blog/credit-management-software2

paidnice.com/blog/credit-control-software-compared2

trove.works/credit-control-software-compared2

accessintell.com/pricing1

accounting.events/reviews/best-credit-control-software1

accountsreceivable.ai/blog/chaser-pricing1

api2.f6s.com/software/chaser1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trove's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trove, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trove.works is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.