AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › vManager · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

vManager

16Judge labels
4First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in Telecom expense mgmt for small business buyers
Rank 27 of 89 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In telecom expense mgmt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named vManager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Telecom expense managementSpend and procurement0%27 of 890%3under 10 labels · led by Genuity at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for vManager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated vManager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labels1
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative6 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Lightyear or vManager if you are a mid-sized company looking for a more affordable, software-only solution” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Telecom expense mgmt · comparative prompt · alternative
“vCom is the premier mid-market choice” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Telecom expense mgmt · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as vManager, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and vManager was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Tangoe One Telecom10 of 161Not among the top eight
Calero9 of 161Not among the top eight
Lightyear8 of 165Not among the top eight
Genuity6 of 164Not among the top eight
Sakon6 of 160Not among the top eight
SpikeFli Analytics5 of 160Not among the top eight
Brightfin4 of 160Not among the top eight
Cimpl4 of 160Not among the top eight
OneBill4 of 160Not among the top eight
Zoho Expense3 of 160Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named vManager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named vManager and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

Where vManager stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
110 a month (“vmanager”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
24 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 27 of 89 in telecom expense mgmt
Segment leader
19%
Genuity
First choices
4 across its categories
Named in
16 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as vManager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as vManager; a claim can dispute any of them.
vCom Solutions / vManager 1

Follow vManager

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when vManager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as vManager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for vManager by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where vManager is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name vManager, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.