| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense management | Spend and procurement | 17% | 2 of 46 | 3% | 31 | accepted challenger |
| Spend management platforms | Spend and procurement | 0% | 10 of 39 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger |
| Corporate travel management | Spend and procurement | 0% | 19 of 60 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Navan at 51% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“the strongest overall choice is usually Zoho Expense because it is repeatedly identified as the best budget-friendly option” Perplexity Sonar · Expense management · budget prompt · first choice
“The best expense management software for a company with a limited budget includes Zoho Expense, BILL Spend & Expense, and Ramp.” Llama 4 Maverick · Expense management · budget prompt · first choice
“Zoho Expense – Best overall for most businesses, offering strong automation and integration with Zoho's ecosystem.” Mistral Small · Expense management · comparative prompt · first choice
“Zoho Expense (Best Overall Value) Zoho is widely considered the best bang-for-your-buck solution.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Expense management · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“those that demand manual receipt handling (Expensify, Dext, Zoho Expense, SAP Concur)” Mistral Small · Expense management · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 121 of the 141 answers that named Zoho Expense and are not a share of its labels.
464 of the 464 domain citations in answers naming Zoho Expense came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Zoho Expense's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Zoho Expense, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at zohoexpense.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.