Entity management · October 2026 Edition
Diligent Entities vs EntityKeeper
Three of fourteen models named Diligent Entities first on the direct prompt; zero named EntityKeeper. Both were named by all fourteen models and Diligent Entities carries 56 labels and EntityKeeper 40, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
First-choice share8%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate46%10%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels5640A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Diligent Entities reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Athennian was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Athennian vs Diligent Entities · Athennian vs EntityKeeper · ContractZen vs Diligent Entities
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the entity management page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Diligent EntitiesFirst choices, of fourteen modelsEntityKeeper
Direct306 against Diligent Entities
Paraphrase125 against Diligent Entities
Comparative30
Budget-constrained017 against Diligent Entities · 2 against EntityKeeper
Scale-constrained00
Negative108 against Diligent Entities · 2 against EntityKeeper
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Diligent Entities and EntityKeeper were named in the same answer sixty-eight times, of the 156 answers naming Diligent Entities and the 103 naming EntityKeeper. In those answers EntityKeeper took the first choice fourteen times and Diligent Entities eleven.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Diligent Entities and EntityKeeper stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Diligent Entities EntityKeeper first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Diligent Entities on the left and EntityKeeper on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Diligent Entities and EntityKeeper stood in it.
Diligent Entities first, EntityKeeper not the choice
3 of 14 modelsEntityKeeper was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniDiligent Entities alternatives: Athennian, CSC Entity Management
Perplexity SonarDiligent Entities alternatives: Commenda, GateWay Entities
MiniMax M2.5Athennian, Diligent Entities alternatives: Eqvista, Harbor Compliance
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashAthennian alternatives: ContractZen, Diliforce, EntityKeeper, MinuteBox
Grok 4.1 FastAthennian alternatives: Commenda, EntityKeeper, Filejet
Mistral SmallAthennian, Filejet alternatives: Commenda, Diligent Entities, Discern
DeepSeek V4 FlashAthennian alternatives: Commenda, EntityKeeper, Filejet
GLM 4.7 FlashXAthennian alternatives: Diligent Entities, EntityKeeper, Filejet
GPT-6 LunaAthennian alternatives: CSC Entity Management, EntityKeeper
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Athennian, Commenda alternatives: Klea
Llama 4 MaverickCommenda, ContractZen alternatives: NEWTON
Qwen 3.7 FlashLegally alternatives: Diligent Boards, Docuum, Onspring
Kimi K2Athennian alternatives: Filejet, NEWTON
Muse Glimmer 30BAthennian alternatives: CSC Entity Management, CT Corporation Entity Management, Commenda, Discern
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
EntityKeeper leads by twenty-three points.
EntityKeeper23%#1 of 8Diligent Entities0%#8 of 8Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Diligent Entities leads at mid-market.
Diligent Entities8%#3 of 11EntityKeeper6%#4 of 11Enterprise
Diligent Entities leads by fifty points.
Diligent Entities50%#1 of 9EntityKeeper0%#9 of 9What the models said about Diligent Entities
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid: Diligent Entities — While powerful, it's typically over-engineered and overpriced for mid-market” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“"What to Avoid: Diligent Entities and similar enterprise solutions - typically start at $15,000-$50,000/year"” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pricier options like Diligent Entities or CSC (enterprise-level, $100s+ per entity/month)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Best for: Large enterprises... Market-leading security protocols... 150+ entities or complex global structures: Diligent Entities or CSC provide enterprise-grade capabilities” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you're a large multinational with 150+ entities across many jurisdictions → Diligent Entities or CSC provide the deepest enterprise governance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Diligent Entities and CSC Entity Management are frequently recommended due to their scalability” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about EntityKeeper
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“I'd skip EntityKeeper on a tight budget: its published annual plans start at $5,000” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid giants like EntityKeeper or Diligent unless you are prepared to pay $5,000+/year” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“"Legacy/Standalone Entity Databases (e.g., Basic Spreadsheets or Early CRMs like Generic \"EntityKeeper\" for Scale-Up Beyond Small Portfolios)"” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“For the most budget-conscious option, EntityKeeper's free plan is a strong starting point.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“🥇 Top Pick: EntityKeeper (for Entity Management)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“EntityKeeper is the tool I'd recommend first” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Athennian vs Diligent EntitiesAthennian vs EntityKeeperContractZen vs Diligent EntitiesContractZen vs EntityKeeperDiligent Entities vs FilejetDiligent Entities vs CommendaDiligent Entities vs MinuteBoxDiligent Entities vs DiscernEntityKeeper vs FilejetEntityKeeper vs CommendaEntityKeeper vs MinuteBoxEntityKeeper vs DiscernAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full entity management standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.