Every category where a model named Diligent Entities for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Entity management	Equity and corporate	3%	6 of 87	29%	31	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Diligent Entities yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Diligent Entities across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	3	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	1	2	6
Mistral Small	0	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	3	1	1	5
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct27 labels10

Paraphrase12 labels5

Comparative26 labels6not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labelsNone

Scale-constrained12 labels1

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative98 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Diligent Entities is the industry standard for enterprise governance.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Entity management · comparative prompt · first choice

“Best overall for legal entity management: Diligent Entities” GPT-5.4 mini · Entity management · direct prompt · first choice

“the enterprise standard for multinationals” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · comparative prompt · first choice

“Best for Legal Ops & Governance Structure: Diligent Entities is the industry standard for board-ready visualizations” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Entity management · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid: Diligent Entities and similar enterprise solutions - typically start at $15,000-$50,000/year” Kimi K2 · Entity management · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid Enterprise Tools: Athennian, Diligent Entities, etc., start at $15K+/year—overkill and too pricey” Grok 4.1 Fast · Entity management · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid enterprise platforms like Diligent Entities or Athennian if budget-constrained” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · budget prompt · hard negative

“you might need to look at heavy enterprise options like Diligent Entities. However, for most mid-market B2B companies, the agility, price, and modern UX of Athennian or MinuteBox will provide a far better” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Entity management · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Diligent Entities, over the 98 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Diligent Entities was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Athennian79 of 9814Not in the top three

CSC Entity Management52 of 985Not in the top three

EntityKeeper48 of 9810Not in the top three

Computershare GEMS31 of 982Not in the top three

CT Corporation Entity Management27 of 980Not in the top three

MinuteBox24 of 985Not in the top three

Corporify22 of 980Not in the top three

Wolters Kluwer Legisway19 of 981Not in the top three

Commenda18 of 986Not in the top three

Carta18 of 983Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Diligent Entities. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 82 of the 98 answers that named Diligent Entities and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org57

coverpin.com48

g2.com40

getapp.com37

f6s.com36

capterra.com35

diligent.comYour site35

anywherer.com31

gitnux.org31

techbullion.com31

346 of the 381 domain citations in answers naming Diligent Entities came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

coverpin.com/resources/top-10-entity-management-tools-compared47

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-management-software38

capterra.com/entity-management-software33

anywherer.com/best-corporate-entity-management-software31

f6s.com/software/category/legal-entity-management31

techbullion.com/the-6-best-entity-management-tools-in-202631

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-software31

worldmetrics.org/best/legal-entity-management-software29

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Diligent Entities

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Diligent Entities; a claim can dispute any of them.

Diligent Entities (formerly Blueprint OneWorld) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Diligent Entities's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Diligent Entities, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at diligent.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.