Every category where a model named EntityKeeper for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Entity management	Equity and corporate	16%	2 of 87	3%	31	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EntityKeeper yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EntityKeeper across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	2	0	5
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	0	3
Mistral Small	1	2	0	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	3	0	1	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	1	1	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	0	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	0	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labels5

Paraphrase11 labels6

Comparative25 labels5not counted in share

Budget-constrained19 labels7

Scale-constrained10 labelsNone

Negative11 labels5not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative87 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 28 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most small companies, EntityKeeper or Filejet are the best starting points due to their low cost” Mistral Small · Entity management · budget prompt · first choice

“EntityKeeper stands out as the most budget-aligned option because it is described as affordable” Perplexity Sonar · Entity management · budget prompt · first choice

“For a typical mid-sized B2B company, I'd recommend starting with EntityKeeper” Kimi K2 · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“MinuteBox or EntityKeeper (business plan) are your best bets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“user reviews on Reddit specifically call out its "limited integration capabilities."” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EntityKeeper, over the 87 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EntityKeeper was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Athennian60 of 8712Compare →

Diligent Entities48 of 873Not in the top three

CSC Entity Management38 of 873Not in the top three

MinuteBox25 of 871Not in the top three

Carta22 of 873Not in the top three

Corporify22 of 872Not in the top three

Filejet22 of 872Not in the top three

CT Corporation Entity Management18 of 870Not in the top three

Computershare GEMS17 of 871Not in the top three

ContractZen16 of 875Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EntityKeeper. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 76 of the 87 answers that named EntityKeeper and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org54

techbullion.com45

coverpin.com44

capterra.com39

getapp.com39

g2.com37

zipdo.co31

f6s.com30

gitnux.org30

sourceforge.net26

375 of the 375 domain citations in answers naming EntityKeeper came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

techbullion.com/the-6-best-entity-management-tools-in-202645

coverpin.com/resources/top-10-entity-management-tools-compared43

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-management-software42

capterra.com/entity-management-software35

worldmetrics.org/best/entity-software29

getapp.com/operations-management-software/entity-management27

f6s.com/software/category/legal-entity-management26

g2.com/categories/entity-management24

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EntityKeeper's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EntityKeeper, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at entitykeeper.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.