Boardable vs Diligent
Zero of twelve models named Boardable first on the direct prompt; one named Diligent. Boardable was named by twelve of the twelve models and Diligent by nine and Boardable carries 25 labels and Diligent 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.
By framing
BoardableFirst choices, of twelve modelsDiligent
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Boardable and Diligent were named in the same answer twenty-one times, of the 70 answers naming Boardable and the 74 naming Diligent. In those answers Diligent took the first choice two times and Boardable four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Boardable Diligent first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Boardable on the left and Diligent on the right.The direct prompt
Diligent first, Boardable not the choice
1 of 12 modelsBoardable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was named
11 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Boardable20%#2 of 10Diligent0%#10 of 10Boardable14%#2 of 14Diligent2%#6 of 14Diligent2%#6 of 9Boardable0%#– of 9What the models said about Boardable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Limited governance depth; fewer advanced features; overkill for larger or complex boards” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · soft negative
“If you need a simple, affordable solution for a small board and are comfortable with manual setup: Boardable (Core) or Google Workspace.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“For the most affordable and straightforward solution, Boardable is likely the best choice if your needs are basic.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Boardable if you have a very small board (under 10 members) and want the lowest per-user cost” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Diligent
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.
“Diligent ($15K\u201330K+/yr) and Board Intelligence are enterprise standard but far out of budget. Skip these” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“I would avoid Diligent, BoardEffect, and Boardvantage if budget is the main constraint” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Large public company: Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage (robust compliance, audit trails)” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Diligent is widely considered the gold standard.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Diligent is the titan of the industry. It is highly secure and customizable but can be very expensive and complex to implement.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.