Zero of twelve models named Boardable first on the direct prompt; two named Nasdaq Boardvantage. Both were named by all twelve models and Boardable carries 25 labels and Nasdaq Boardvantage 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Boardable and Nasdaq Boardvantage were named in the same answer thirty-four times, of the 70 answers naming Boardable and the 87 naming Nasdaq Boardvantage. In those answers Nasdaq Boardvantage took the first choice four times and Boardable six.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Limited governance depth; fewer advanced features; overkill for larger or complex boards” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · soft negative
“If you need a simple, affordable solution for a small board and are comfortable with manual setup: Boardable (Core) or Google Workspace.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“For the most affordable and straightforward solution, Boardable is likely the best choice if your needs are basic.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Boardable if you have a very small board (under 10 members) and want the lowest per-user cost” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“I would avoid Diligent, BoardEffect, and Boardvantage if budget is the main constraint” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid ... typically overkill (and overpriced) for mid-market B2B companies” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · hard negative
“it's heavy, has dated UX, and lacks transparent pricing. Generally overkill/overpriced for most mid-market B2B firms.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“If you prioritize governance, compliance, and a robust feature set, Nasdaq Boardvantage is the top choice.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Large public company: Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage (robust compliance, audit trails)” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for: Large/listed companies needing high security and Nasdaq ecosystem integration” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.