Finance AI Index
Index Planning and analysis Board › Nasdaq Boardvantage vs Diligent
Board and investor reporting · September 2026 Edition

Nasdaq Boardvantage vs Diligent

Two of twelve models named Nasdaq Boardvantage first on the direct prompt; one named Diligent. Nasdaq Boardvantage was named by twelve of the twelve models and Diligent by nine and Nasdaq Boardvantage carries 26 labels and Diligent 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Nasdaq Boardvantage

criticized challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Diligent

criticized challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share5%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate35%71%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#6A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels2617A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Nasdaq Boardvantage reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.OnBoard was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. OnBoard vs Nasdaq Boardvantage · OnBoard vs Diligent · Boardable vs Nasdaq Boardvantage

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Nasdaq BoardvantageFirst choices, of twelve modelsDiligent
Direct214 against Nasdaq Boardvantage · 1 against Diligent
Paraphrase00
Comparative311 against Nasdaq Boardvantage
Budget-constrained002 against Nasdaq Boardvantage · 6 against Diligent
Scale-constrained002 against Nasdaq Boardvantage · 3 against Diligent
Negative002 against Diligent
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Nasdaq Boardvantage and Diligent were named in the same answer twenty-five times, of the 87 answers naming Nasdaq Boardvantage and the 74 naming Diligent. In those answers Diligent took the first choice zero times and Nasdaq Boardvantage zero.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Nasdaq Boardvantage and Diligent stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Nasdaq Boardvantage Diligent first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Nasdaq Boardvantage on the left and Diligent on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Nasdaq Boardvantage and Diligent stood in it.

Nasdaq Boardvantage first, Diligent not the choice

2 of 12 modelsDiligent was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallNasdaq Boardvantage alternatives: BoardEffect, Datarails, Fairview
Llama 4 MaverickNasdaq Boardvantage alternatives: Datarails, Fairview

Diligent first, Nasdaq Boardvantage not the choice

1 of 12 modelsNasdaq Boardvantage was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Qwen 3.7 FlashDiligent alternatives: Enboarder, Fello, OnBoard

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniOnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, BoardPro, Diligent Boards, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Perplexity SonarOnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, BoardEffect, Nasdaq Boardvantage
GLM 4.7 FlashXAprio Board Portal, OnBoard alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, BoardEffect, Govenda, Nasdaq Boardvantage

Neither was named

6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Board Intelligence, HighRadius
Gemini 3.5 FlashMosaic, OnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, Cube, Datarails, Govenda, Jirav
Grok 4.1 FastOnBoard alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, BoardPro, iBabs
DeepSeek V4 FlashOnBoard alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, Fairview
Kimi K2Datarails alternatives: Cube, Planful
MiniMax M2.5OnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Datarails, Planful

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Nasdaq Boardvantage leads by two points.
Nasdaq Boardvantage2%#7 of 10
Diligent0%#10 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Nasdaq Boardvantage leads by two points.
Nasdaq Boardvantage5%#4 of 14
Diligent2%#6 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Nasdaq Boardvantage leads by eighteen points.
Nasdaq Boardvantage20%#1 of 9
Diligent2%#6 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Nasdaq Boardvantage

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“I would avoid Diligent, BoardEffect, and Boardvantage if budget is the main constraint” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid ... typically overkill (and overpriced) for mid-market B2B companies” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · hard negative
“it's heavy, has dated UX, and lacks transparent pricing. Generally overkill/overpriced for most mid-market B2B firms.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“If you prioritize governance, compliance, and a robust feature set, Nasdaq Boardvantage is the top choice.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Large public company: Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage (robust compliance, audit trails)” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for: Large/listed companies needing high security and Nasdaq ecosystem integration” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Diligent

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of five in this category shown.

“Diligent ($15K\u201330K+/yr) and Board Intelligence are enterprise standard but far out of budget. Skip these” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“I would avoid Diligent, BoardEffect, and Boardvantage if budget is the main constraint” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Large public company: Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage (robust compliance, audit trails)” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Diligent is widely considered the gold standard.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Diligent is the titan of the industry. It is highly secure and customizable but can be very expensive and complex to implement.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.