Board and investor reporting · September 2026 Edition
Nasdaq Boardvantage vs Datarails
Two of twelve models named Nasdaq Boardvantage first on the direct prompt; one named Datarails. Nasdaq Boardvantage was named by twelve of the twelve models and Datarails by nine and Nasdaq Boardvantage carries 26 labels and Datarails 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in ten categories this edition.
First-choice share5%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate35%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#5A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels2612A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Nasdaq Boardvantage reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.OnBoard was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. OnBoard vs Nasdaq Boardvantage · OnBoard vs Datarails · Boardable vs Nasdaq Boardvantage
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Nasdaq BoardvantageFirst choices, of twelve modelsDatarails
Direct214 against Nasdaq Boardvantage
Paraphrase00
Comparative301 against Nasdaq Boardvantage
Budget-constrained002 against Nasdaq Boardvantage
Scale-constrained002 against Nasdaq Boardvantage
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Nasdaq Boardvantage and Datarails stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Nasdaq Boardvantage Datarails first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Nasdaq Boardvantage on the left and Datarails on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Nasdaq Boardvantage and Datarails stood in it.
Nasdaq Boardvantage first, Datarails an alternative
2 of 12 modelsDatarails was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Mistral SmallNasdaq Boardvantage alternatives: BoardEffect, Datarails, Fairview
Llama 4 MaverickNasdaq Boardvantage alternatives: Datarails, Fairview
Datarails first, Nasdaq Boardvantage not the choice
1 of 12 modelsNasdaq Boardvantage was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Kimi K2Datarails alternatives: Cube, Planful
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniOnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, BoardPro, Diligent Boards, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Gemini 3.5 FlashMosaic, OnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, Cube, Datarails, Govenda, Jirav
Perplexity SonarOnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, BoardEffect, Nasdaq Boardvantage
GLM 4.7 FlashXAprio Board Portal, OnBoard alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, BoardEffect, Govenda, Nasdaq Boardvantage
MiniMax M2.5OnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Datarails, Planful
Neither was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Board Intelligence, HighRadius
Grok 4.1 FastOnBoard alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, BoardPro, iBabs
DeepSeek V4 FlashOnBoard alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, Fairview
Qwen 3.7 FlashDiligent alternatives: Enboarder, Fello, OnBoard
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Nasdaq Boardvantage leads by two points.
Nasdaq Boardvantage2%#7 of 10Datarails0%#– of 10Mid-marketThe figures above
Nasdaq Boardvantage leads by two points.
Nasdaq Boardvantage5%#4 of 14Datarails2%#5 of 14Enterprise
Nasdaq Boardvantage leads by twenty points.
Nasdaq Boardvantage20%#1 of 9Datarails0%#– of 9What the models said about Nasdaq Boardvantage
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“I would avoid Diligent, BoardEffect, and Boardvantage if budget is the main constraint” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid ... typically overkill (and overpriced) for mid-market B2B companies” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · hard negative
“it's heavy, has dated UX, and lacks transparent pricing. Generally overkill/overpriced for most mid-market B2B firms.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“If you prioritize governance, compliance, and a robust feature set, Nasdaq Boardvantage is the top choice.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Large public company: Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage (robust compliance, audit trails)” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for: Large/listed companies needing high security and Nasdaq ecosystem integration” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Datarails
No label in this category carried a quote.
Also compared
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.