BoardPro vs Nasdaq Boardvantage
Zero of twelve models named BoardPro first on the direct prompt; two named Nasdaq Boardvantage. BoardPro was named by eleven of the twelve models and Nasdaq Boardvantage by twelve and BoardPro carries 22 labels and Nasdaq Boardvantage 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.
By framing
BoardProFirst choices, of twelve modelsNasdaq Boardvantage
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, BoardPro and Nasdaq Boardvantage were named in the same answer twenty-eight times, of the 62 answers naming BoardPro and the 87 naming Nasdaq Boardvantage. In those answers Nasdaq Boardvantage took the first choice two times and BoardPro eight.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
BoardPro Nasdaq Boardvantage first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, BoardPro on the left and Nasdaq Boardvantage on the right.The direct prompt
Nasdaq Boardvantage first, BoardPro not the choice
2 of 12 modelsBoardPro was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
BoardPro20%#3 of 10Nasdaq Boardvantage2%#7 of 10BoardPro7%#3 of 14Nasdaq Boardvantage5%#4 of 14Nasdaq Boardvantage20%#1 of 9BoardPro2%#– of 9What the models said about BoardPro
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“If you want the best value with more features: BoardPro offers the best balance of price and functionality” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall for SMBs; repeatable board packs with controlled approvals and audit trails” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“For most companies on a tight budget, BoardPro is the sweet spot” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Nasdaq Boardvantage
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“I would avoid Diligent, BoardEffect, and Boardvantage if budget is the main constraint” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“What to Avoid ... typically overkill (and overpriced) for mid-market B2B companies” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · hard negative
“it's heavy, has dated UX, and lacks transparent pricing. Generally overkill/overpriced for most mid-market B2B firms.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“If you prioritize governance, compliance, and a robust feature set, Nasdaq Boardvantage is the top choice.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Large public company: Diligent or Nasdaq Boardvantage (robust compliance, audit trails)” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for: Large/listed companies needing high security and Nasdaq ecosystem integration” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.