Index › Planning and analysis › Corporate performance ma › Jedox vs Anaplan

Corporate performance management · September 2026 Edition

Jedox vs Anaplan

Zero of twelve models named Jedox first on the direct prompt; zero named Anaplan. Jedox was named by ten of the twelve models and Anaplan by twelve and Jedox carries 15 labels and Anaplan 41, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Jedox

accepted challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

Anaplan

criticized challenger

Named in six categories this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate7%56%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.

Labels1541A count; the two differ.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Jedox reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Planful was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Planful vs Jedox · Planful vs Anaplan · Vena vs Jedox

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the corporate performance management page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

JedoxFirst choices, of twelve modelsAnaplan

Direct001 against Anaplan

Paraphrase015 against Anaplan

Comparative003 against Anaplan

Budget-constrained104 against Anaplan

Scale-constrained002 against Anaplan

Negative001 against Jedox · 8 against Anaplan

Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Jedox and Anaplan stood in it.

Model	Direct	Paraphrase	Comparative	Budget-constrained	Scale-constrained	Negative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5

Jedox

Anaplan

first choice

named as an alternative

argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Jedox on the left and Anaplan on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Jedox and Anaplan stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.

Qwen 3.7 FlashSonar alternatives: Anaplan, OneStream, Planful, Vena

Neither was named

11 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice

GPT-5.4 miniWorkday Adaptive Planning alternatives: OneStream, Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM

Gemini 3.5 FlashPigment alternatives: Cube, Mosaic, NetSuite Planning and Budgeting, Planful, Prophix, Vena

Perplexity SonarPlanful alternatives: Drivetrain, Prophix

Grok 4.1 FastPlanful alternatives: Drivetrain, Prophix, Vena

Mistral SmallPlanful alternatives: Cube, Drivetrain, Prophix

DeepSeek V4 FlashPlanful, Prophix alternatives: Cube, Datarails, Drivetrain, Vena, Workday Adaptive Planning

Llama 4 MaverickPlanful alternatives: Drivetrain, Prophix, Workday Adaptive Planning, deFacto Global

Kimi K2Planful, Prophix alternatives: Cube, Drivetrain, OneStream, Vena

GLM 4.7 FlashXProphix alternatives: Drivetrain, Limelight, Planful, Vena

MiniMax M2.5Pigment, Planful, Prophix alternatives: Cube, Drivetrain, Workday Adaptive Planning

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

Level: the same share of first choices.

Jedox#– of 11

Anaplan#11 of 11

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

Level: the same share of first choices.

Jedox#7 of 12

Anaplan#8 of 12

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

Anaplan leads by thirty points.

Anaplan#2 of 12

Jedox#– of 12

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Jedox

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Flexibility can lead to complex implementations; limited formatted reporting capabilities” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative

“Jedox and Small Improvements are the top recommendations. Jedox is ideal for financial planning and analysis” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice

“Has a published entry tier ("Essential," ... so costs are more transparent than quote-only competitors” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · alternative

“Offers affordable subscription plans - Good for small businesses needing budgeting & forecasting” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · alternative

What the models said about Anaplan

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“you generally want to avoid heavy enterprise platforms like Anaplan or Oracle (which cost tens of thousands annually)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative

“Anaplan or Workday Adaptive Planning are the top recommendations due to their scalability, strong FP&A features” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice

Also compared

Planful vs Jedox Planful vs Anaplan Vena vs Jedox Vena vs Anaplan Prophix vs Jedox Prophix vs Anaplan Workday Adaptive Planning vs Jedox Workday Adaptive Planning vs Anaplan Pigment vs Jedox Pigment vs Anaplan Cube vs Jedox Cube vs Anaplan All twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full corporate performance ma standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.