Ivalua vs Jaggaer
One of twelve models named Ivalua first on the direct prompt; zero named Jaggaer. Ivalua was named by eight of the twelve models and Jaggaer by eleven and Ivalua carries 11 labels and Jaggaer 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the strategic sourcing page.
By framing
IvaluaFirst choices, of twelve modelsJaggaer
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Ivalua and Jaggaer were named in the same answer 122 times, of the 208 answers naming Ivalua and the 187 naming Jaggaer. In those answers Jaggaer took the first choice three times and Ivalua four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Ivalua Jaggaer first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Ivalua on the left and Jaggaer on the right.The direct prompt
Ivalua first, Jaggaer not the choice
1 of 12 modelsJaggaer was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
8 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Ivalua4%#5 of 11Jaggaer2%#6 of 11Ivalua8%#3 of 7Jaggaer8%#4 of 7What the models said about Ivalua
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“full enterprise suites may be overkill unless you're already heavily invested in that ecosystem” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · soft negative
“It is considered the top choice for mid-market and enterprise organizations due to its comprehensive features and flexibility.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“shortlist against Coupa, Jaggaer, GEP SMART, and Ivalua” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“stronger full-suite procurement platforms that tend to fit more complex organizations” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · alternative
What the models said about Jaggaer
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“Avoid massive enterprise suites like SAP Ariba, Coupa (Enterprise tier), or JAGGAER” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · hard negative
“shortlist against Coupa, Jaggaer, GEP SMART, and Ivalua” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.