Tradogram vs Ivalua
Zero of twelve models named Tradogram first on the direct prompt; one named Ivalua. Tradogram was named by nine of the twelve models and Ivalua by eight and Tradogram carries 19 labels and Ivalua 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the strategic sourcing page.
By framing
TradogramFirst choices, of twelve modelsIvalua
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Tradogram and Ivalua were named in the same answer twenty times, of the 148 answers naming Tradogram and the 208 naming Ivalua. In those answers Ivalua took the first choice zero times and Tradogram four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Tradogram Ivalua first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Tradogram on the left and Ivalua on the right.The direct prompt
Ivalua first, Tradogram not the choice
1 of 12 modelsTradogram was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Tradogram45%#1 of 12Ivalua0%#– of 12Ivalua8%#3 of 7Tradogram—not namedWhat the models said about Tradogram
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“I'd recommend starting with Tradogram or Prokuria as they offer strong e-sourcing and RFP functionality without enterprise-level pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Recommended as the best for SMB (small and medium-sized business) sourcing, offering features tailored to smaller budgets” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Ivalua
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.
“full enterprise suites may be overkill unless you're already heavily invested in that ecosystem” GLM 4.7 FlashX · scale prompt · soft negative
“It is considered the top choice for mid-market and enterprise organizations due to its comprehensive features and flexibility.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“shortlist against Coupa, Jaggaer, GEP SMART, and Ivalua” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“stronger full-suite procurement platforms that tend to fit more complex organizations” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.